Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to perform a systematic review of published evidence on the psychometric properties of 3-level version of EQ-5D-Y and 5-level version of EQ-5D-Y (EQ-5D-Y-5L).

Methods

A literature search on the MEDLINE, Embase, and EuroQol website (until June 2021) was conducted. Original studies on EQ-5D-Y psychometric properties such as feasibility, distribution properties (ceiling and floor effects), reliability (test-retest, interrater, intermodal), validity (known-groups, convergent), and responsiveness, published as full-text articles in English, were included. Studies on experimental EQ-5D-Y versions were excluded. The following data were pooled using random effects models: missing values, the ceiling effect, and correlations coefficients with other measures.

Results

A total of 47 studies (inclusive of 7 on EQ-5D-Y-5L) containing data from 45 310 children and 2690 proxy respondents representing 15 countries were included. These studies were characterized as being high quality according to the quality index. The most represented areas were school populations and musculoskeletal diseases and orthopedics. The EQ-5D-Y dimensions, EQ visual analog scale, and EQ index were reported in 89%, 77%, and 26% of studies, respectively. Most articles addressed validity (known-groups, n = 27; convergent, n = 21) and reliability (test-retest and interrater, n = 10 each). Convergent validity studies showed that, where the assessment of the child’s functioning at school is required, EQ-5D-Y should be supplemented with other school-specific measures.

Conclusions

This systematic review provides a summary of measurement properties and the psychometric performance of 3-level version of EQ-5D-Y and EQ-5D-Y-5L. The existing evidence supports using the EQ-5D-Y descriptive system and EQ visual analog scale in children and adolescent populations. Further research on test-retest reliability and the responsiveness of the EQ-5D-Y index obtained with child-specific value sets is needed.