ROMIPLOSTIM COST PER RESPONSE IN ITP TREATMENT IN THE BRAZILIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

Author(s)

Pepe C1, Teich V1, Coutinho MB2, Almeida S3
1NewBD/Medinsight - Grupo Resulta, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Amgen Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3Amgen, São Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia with no underlying cause. It manifests clinically as mucocutaneous bleeding caused by decreased platelets. Recently, two thrombopoietin receptor-agonists have emerged as an important therapeutic options: romiplostim and eltrombopag. Since these medications have different mode of administration, safety and efficacy profiles, the present study was carried out in an attempt to investigate which drug would be more cost-effective in the Brazilian setting. The objective was to perform an economic analysis evaluating the cost per response of romiplostim versus eltrombopag in adult patients with chronic ITP and refractory to other treatments as corticosteroids and immunoglobulins in Brazil healthcare private system. METHODS: Two economic analyses were performed in order to study the use of romiplostim and eltrombopag for the treatment of adults with chronic refractory ITP, based on annual treatment costs and cost per response. The average body weight adopted was 74,6 kg. Efficacy data were obtained from the product inserts, as well as from scientific publications. In cost per response, it was considered a 6-month analysis, which corresponds to the overall platelet response in clinical trials. The outcome of these trials was the global response to treatment. The cost of each drug presentation were based on ex-factory price (VAT 18%) and obtained from the official price list (CMED; April, 2014). RESULTS: The cost of treatment with romiplostim showed an annual saving of R$7,724 over eltrombopag within the payer perspective, which may be further improved if we assume that drug-food interactions of eltrombopag in some patients lead to reduced medication adherence and loss of response. The cost per response with romiplostim was 26% lower than with eltrombopag. CONCLUSIONS: Romiplostim was more cost-effective than eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic refractory ITP in adult patients and may represent savings to the Brazilian health system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PSY47

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×