COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PEGINTERFERON-ALFA-2A (40 KD) ASSOCIATED WITH RIBAVIRIN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C IN BRAZIL UNDER THE PRIVATE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Author(s)
Raymundo Parana, PhD, Professor1, Hoel Sette, PhD, Professor2, Mario Pessoa, PhD, Professor3, Deborah Crespo, PhD, Professor4, Fmr Barros, PhD, Professor5, Eduardo AV Santos, Bachelor, Health Economics Analyst6, Mario Giorgio Saggia, MBA, Health Economics Manager6, Fernando Tatsch, MD, Medical manager6, Rafael Simoes, MD, Medical Manager61Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil; 2 Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil; 3 Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil; 4 Universidade Federal do Para, Belem, PA, Brazil; 5 Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil; 6 Roche Brazil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Objective: Hepatitis C is a disease affecting approximately 180 million people worldwide (WHO 2006) and is one of the main causes of chronic hepatic disease. HCV infection progresses to chronic form in 80% of infected individuals. Approximately 20% progress to cirrhosis over 20 years and, consequently, a high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma population. We assessed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin (PEG+RBV) versus interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin (IFN+RBV) in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C under the Brazilian payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was built to estimate the clinical and economic impact related to the incorporation of peginterferon-alfa-2a (40 KD). Clinical stages were based on liver histology, forms of cirrhotic decompensation, liver cancer and liver transplantation. A Delphi panel was performed for evaluating the direct medical resources related to each clinical stage in chronic hepatitis C, as well as costs from treatment with peginterferon-alfa-2a (40 KD), interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Effectiveness of treatment with peginterferon-alfa-2a (40 KD) was obtained from a multicenter, controlled, randomized trial involving 1121 naive patients with chronic hepatitis C (Fried et al, 2002). The model comprises a life-time horizon. We have assumed a discount rate of 3% for both costs and outcomes according to international recommendations (Gold et al, 1996). A sensitivity analysis was conducted using second-order Monte Carlo simulation. Tested parameters were costs per stage, treatment costs, discount rate, response rate to treatment, inflation rate and early patient distribution. Results: The ICER of PEG+RBV versus no treatment was approximately -R$62,521 per quality-adjusted life year(QALY) gained. The ICER of PEG+RBV versus IFN+RBV was approximately -R$20,087 per QALY. Conclusion: The study suggests peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD) and ribavirin to be a dominant therapy for treating hepatitis C in the private health care system in Brazil.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)
Code
PIN14
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)
Explore Related HEOR by Topic