Indirect Treatment Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Capivasertib-Fulvestrant Versus Alpelisib-Fulvestrant for PIK3CA-Altered, HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer after Disease Progression Following Endocrine-Based Therapy

Author(s)

de Wilt E1, Hettle R1, Liljas B2
1AstraZeneca, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK, 2AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: For patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-altered advanced breast cancer (aBC) with disease progression following endocrine-based therapy, FDA approved treatments include alpelisib-fulvestrant (PIK3CA-altered only) and capivasertib-fulvestrant (PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered). In the SOLAR-1 (NCT02437318) and CAPItello-291 (NCT04305496) phase 3 studies, these regimens demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo-fulvestrant. As there are no head-to-head studies between regimens, we assessed the relative efficacy and safety of capivasertib-fulvestrant versus alpelisib-fulvestrant for PIK3CA-altered aBC via indirect treatment comparison (ITC).

METHODS: Anchored Bayesian ITCs were performed on investigator-assessed PFS, any grade adverse event (AE) leading to treatment discontinuation, any grade 3 or 4 AE, and relevant individual AEs. The efficacy ITC was conducted using (log) hazard ratio scale using published data from PIK3CA-altered subgroups of SOLAR-1 and CAPItello-291. Safety ITCs were conducted on a risk difference (RD) scale using aggregate data from the safety analysis set of each study. Hazard ratio/RD estimates were calculated alongside 95% credible intervals (95%CrI).

RESULTS: For PFS, the hazard ratio for capivasertib-fulvestrant versus alpelisib-fulvestrant was 0.79 (95%CrI 0.52 to 1.18). The Bayesian probability of capivasertib-fulvestrant being more efficacious (HR<1) than alpelisib-fulvestrant was 87%. The safety RD (95%CrI) ITC results suggest nominally significant risk reductions (RD<0.00) for capivasertib-fulvestrant in any AE leading to discontinuation (–0.10: –0.17 to –0.03), any grade 4 AE (–0.07: –0.12 to –0.01) and any grade of hyperglycaemia (–0.43: –0.50 to –0.35), weight decreased (–0.24: –0.30 to –0.18), alopecia (–0.16: –0.22 to –0.11) and stomatitis (–0.08: –0.15 to –0.01), and an increased risk of any grade diarrhoea (0.09: –0.00 to 0.19) versus alpelisib-fulvestrant.

CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-altered aBC capivasertib-fulvestrant has numerically improved PFS and a high probability of being more efficacious than alpelisib-fulvestrant with an overall more favourable safety profile. Results are exploratory and subject to limitations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

CO172

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×