Predicting Overall Survival (OS) Benefit in Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma From Improvements in Response Outcomes: A Correlation Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
Author(s)
Leung L1, Serafini P1, Srinivasan S2, Ejzykowicz F2, Pourrahmat MM1, Moshyk A2, Kurt M2
1Evidinno Outcomes Research Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate ORR and CR as surrogate endpoints for OS by modelling the association between the treatment effects on each surrogate endpoint and OS with aggregate-level data from RCTs investigating first-line therapies for advanced melanoma.METHODS:
A systematic literature review was conducted to identify RCTs reporting hazard ratio of OS (HROS) and odds ratios of ORR (ORORR) or CR (ORCR). Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (BRMA) and weighted linear regression (WLR) models were employed for correlation assessment between ORORR/ORCR and HROS. Surrogacy equations from WLR, weighted using RCT sample sizes, were validated internally using leave-one-out cross-validation, and externally against three recently published RCTs (IMspire170, RELATIVITY-047, PIVOT IO-001). The primary analysis included 26 trials. Sensitivity analyses were restricted to these trials: phase III (n=17), crossover-adjusted or crossover-unallowed (n=19), and using RECISTv1.1 in response assessment (n=20).RESULTS:
In the primary analysis for ORR, BRMA and WLR estimated correlation coefficients of -0.59 (95%CI: [-0.80, -0.25]) and -0.61 (95%CI: [-0.82, -0.25]), respectively. For CR, BRMA and WLR estimated correlations of -0.65 (95%CI: [-0.82, -0.37]) and -0.55 (95%CI: [-0.79, -0.16]), respectively. HROS was predicted accurately from ORORR for 96% of studies (25/26), and from ORCR for 92% of studies (24/26) in cross-validation. In external validation, the average absolute deviations between published and predicted HROS were 0.05 and 0.08 for ORORR and ORCR, respectively. In sensitivity analyses, correlations varied for both ORR (BRMA: -0.53 to -0.63; WLR: -0.56 to -0.64) and CR (BRMA: -0.65 to -0.66; WLR: -0.48 to -0.56), and coverage rate of HROS by 95% PIs ranged between 94-100% for ORR and 94-95% for CR during cross-validation. Restricting the evidence base to crossover-adjusted trials strengthened correlations.CONCLUSIONS:
Treatment effects on both response outcomes were moderately correlated with improvements on OS. Cross-validations of surrogacy equations are indicative of the high and early predictive ability of response outcomes for OS benefit.Conference/Value in Health Info
2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
CO153
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes
Disease
Oncology