Price Trends and Analysis of Targeted Immunomodulatory (TIM) Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy

Author(s)

Adekunle O1, Wang Y1, Yunusa I2, Fleming M1, Seoane-Vazquez E1, Brown LM1
1Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA, USA, 2University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the percentage price change since market entry (ME) and drug cost of approved timDMARDs in the United States, assessed price trends per unit dose over the years and investigated factors influencing ME prices.

METHODS: The study collected average wholesale prices (AWP) per unit dose of timDMARDs from ME to the last effective dates from the Red Book and estimated their aggregate percentage increase and the compound annual growth rate (CAGR). The AWPs per unit dose were computed and used to calculate the drug cost of therapy per recommended monthly dose (RMD). Trends in AWPs per unit dose were also graphically evaluated according to their classifications. Furthermore, correlation and linear regression were performed to identify regulatory factors significantly associated with AWPs at ME.

RESULTS: All timDMARDs’ AWP per unit dose increased significantly over time, with adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, anakinra, and tofacitinib experiencing the highest aggregate percentage increase (106.5%-286.1%). Etanercept had the highest CAGR of 9.9%, followed by golimumab (8.9%), while baricitinib (1.8%) and upadacitinib (1.7%) had the lowest. The drug cost of therapy per RMD for rituximab and golimumab were $20,188.50 and $14,160.50, respectively, compared to sarilumab ($4,337.00) and baricitinib ($3,164.10). Newer timDMARDs entered the market at higher prices compared to previous timDMARDs and caused competitive price increase over the years. However, only application type (P = 0.04) showed a significant association with AWPs at ME despite moderate correlations with the route of administration, orphan designation, classification type, and approval review type.

CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that timDMARD prices at ME have increased over time, with bDMARDs having the highest CAGR. Newer timDMARDs’ prices may induce an increase in older timDMARDs’ prices. The study highlighted the importance of promoting sponsorship for non-biologics and biosimilars to reduce the financial burden on patients and healthcare payers and promote timDMARD utilization.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

EE280

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Biologics & Biosimilars, Drugs, Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×