Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% Improves the Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease in Patients Whose Disease Is Inadequately Controlled on Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05%

Author(s)

Johnston J1, Adler R2, Hessen M3, Nichols K4, Pflugfelder S5, Truett K6, Urbieta M7, Reynolds R8
1Georgia Eye Partners, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2Belcara Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, 3Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, 4School of Optometry, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA, 5Alkek Eye Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, 6KCT Data, Inc., Alpharetta, GA, USA, 7Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA, 8Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Yardley, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial condition for which topical anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs (eg, cyclosporine) are used to treat associated ocular surface inflammation and improve DED signs and symptoms. We assessed efficacy and patient-reported outcomes associated with cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09%), a nanomicellar formulation designed to improve ocular delivery of CsA, in patients with DED that was inadequately controlled on cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (CsA 0.05%).

METHODS: This Phase 4 study enrolled adults with DED that was inadequately controlled (still symptomatic and/or exhibiting disease signs) on current CsA 0.05% therapy for ≥3 months. All patients received CsA 0.09% (1 drop per eye twice daily) for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included central corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), Schirmer’s test, modified Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (mSANDE) questionnaire, and frequency of artificial tear (AT) use at Weeks 4, 8, and 12, as well as treatment preference at Week 12. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting at each visit.

RESULTS: Most patients in the intent-to-treat population (n = 124) were female (87.9%) and the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 65.6 (11.5) years. Mean (SD) changes from baseline were statistically significant for central CFS score (−0.5 [0.9]; P <0.0001), Schirmer’s test score (2.4 [8.6]; P <0.01), mSANDE score (−29.5 [26.4]; P <0.0001), and frequency of AT use (−1.5 [2.4]; P <0.0001) at Week 12 of CsA 0.09% treatment. Also, at Week 12, 86 (69.4%) patients preferred the current treatment with CsA 0.09% over previous CsA 0.05% therapy. Overall, 58 (43.3%) patients reported ≥1 treatment-emergent AE and most AEs were mild in severity (73.8%).

CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily CsA 0.09% was the preferred treatment by most patients and resulted in significant improvements in the signs and symptoms of DED at Week 12 in patients whose disease was inadequately controlled on CsA 0.05%.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

CO81

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinician Reported Outcomes, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Drugs, Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×