Cost-Effectiveness of 3-Antigen Vs. Single-Antigen Vaccine for Prevention of Hepatitis B in Adults in the United States

Author(s)

Anderson S1, Talbird SE2, Nossov M3, Beattie N3, Diaz-Mitoma F3
1RTI Health Solutions, Carrboro, NC, USA, 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 3VBI Vaccines Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: The first 3-antigen hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine was approved by the FDA in November 2021. This analysis estimates the cost-effectiveness of this 3-antigen vaccine relative to a 3-dose, single-antigen vaccine to prevent HepB infection among adults in the United States.

METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a combined decision tree and Markov structure to follow 100,000 adults over their remaining lifetimes after vaccination with either 3-antigen or single-antigen vaccine. Societal and payer perspectives were modeled for adults aged 18-44, 45-64, and ≥ 65 years; diabetics (aged ≥18 years); and obese adults (aged ≥18 years).

Seroprotection rates were obtained from the pivotal, phase 3, head-to-head PROTECT trial (NCT03393754). Incidence, vaccine costs, vaccine adherence rates, direct and indirect costs, utilities, transition probabilities, and mortality were obtained from published sources. Health outcomes and costs (2020 USD) were discounted 3% annually. Total and incremental health and cost outcomes were reported by vaccine and population; the primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (ICER). One-way sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted.

RESULTS: The 3-antigen vaccine reduced cases and increased QALYs for all populations compared with single-antigen vaccine. The 3-antigen vaccine reduced disease-related costs and fully offset increased vaccination costs, making it dominant (cost-saving) compared with single-antigen vaccine for adults aged 18-64 years and adults with diabetes and obesity. For adults aged ≥65 years, the ICER was $26,237. In sensitivity analyses, ICERs in most modeled populations were sensitive to vaccine cost per dose and HepB incidence.

CONCLUSION: 3-antigen vaccine is estimated to lead to fewer HepB cases, complications, and deaths compared with single-antigen vaccine due to higher seroprotection rates. Compared with single-antigen vaccine, 3-antigen vaccine is dominant (cost-saving) from societal and payer perspectives in adults aged 18-64 years and adults with diabetes and obesity, and cost-effective in adults aged ≥65 years.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE489

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Public Health

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×