Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Resmetirom: An Investigational Treatment for the Management of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Author(s)

Javanbakht M1, Fishman J2, Moloney E1, Rydqvist P2, Ansaripour A3
1Optimax Access, Southampton, UK, 2Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 3Optimax Access, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: Resmetirom is an oral, liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) selective agonist in Phase III development for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis (NASH). An economic evaluation was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of resmetirom in the US setting.

METHODS: A Markov model was developed consisting of two sub-models of NASH, with and without cardiovascular (CV) history. In each sub-model, patients transitioned among no-fibrosis (F0) and fibrosis (F1-F3) stages, compensated cirrhosis (or F4), decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, post-liver transplant, and death. Data from a published randomized clinical trial of resmetirom versus placebo were used to populate the model. The transition from the first to second sub-model was driven by the first occurrence of a nonfatal CV event in NASH patients, estimated based on pooled baseline patient characteristics. The model captured worsening and improvement in the patients’ fibrosis stages (F0-F3) based on changes in liver fat, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Model outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cirrhosis/F4 and liver transplant cases avoided, and costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA/PSA) were performed, with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY applied.

RESULTS: An incremental 1.392 QALYs were gained in the resmetirom arm, with an incremental cost of $107,705 compared to no-treatment. The incremental cost/QALY gained for resmetirom versus no-treatment was $77,348. The cirrhosis/F4 and liver transplant risks were reduced by 32.48% and 33.82%, leading to cost savings of $47,880 (-39.98%) and $32,372 (-40.50%) in the resmetirom arm, respectively. The most impactful input parameter was the proportion of patients achieving fibrosis improvement in both arms, according to DSA. The PSA showed that resmetirom was cost-effective, with a probability of 70%.

CONCLUSIONS: Model results showed that managing NASH with resmetirom would be cost-effective in the US; reducing or preventing end-stage liver events and associated costs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE313

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×