Life and Work Productivity Impairment in Adult Continuous Glucose Monitor Users With Type 1 Diabetes: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Author(s)

Boateng-Kuffour A1, Callahan P1, Chandarana K1, Barry D1, Chen L1, Kelly CS2, Nguyen H2, Chapman KS2, Cornelius EM2, Wolf WA2, Polonsky WH3
1Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA, 2T1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA, 3Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs) and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) on life and work productivity in adult continuous glucose monitor (CGM) users with type 1 diabetes (T1D), with a stratification across different insulin delivery methods.

METHODS: Participants (≥18 years) completed an online survey on the Diabetes Productivity Measure (DPM) and measures of SHE frequency and IAH status (modified Gold score ≤2 = normal awareness (IAH-); 3 = borderline (undetermined); ≥4 = impaired awareness (IAH+)). The DPM has two domains that measure life and work productivity impairment (score 0-100; higher score indicates greater productivity). Cohorts were created based on SHE frequency in the past year and IAH status: Problematic SHEs (2+ SHEs/IAH-; 1+ SHE/IAH+), Single SHE/no-IAH (1 SHE/IAH-), Undetermined IAH (0 SHE/borderline IAH), and No-SHE (0 SHE/IAH+; 0 SHE/IAH-). Results were stratified by insulin-delivery methods: multiple daily injections (MDI), predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS), hybrid closed-loop system/do-it-yourself (HCLS/DIY), and pump without automated insulin-delivery (pump no-AID). Work productivity was calculated for participants who reported being employed.

RESULTS: Total mean DPM scores for the Problematic SHEs cohort(n=219) were 62.6(SD=18.7[n=38]), 64.2(SD=17.0[n=22]), 67.3(SD=17.2[n=136]) and 73.2(SD=17.5[n=23]) v. No-SHE cohort(n=735) reported 75.5(SD=17.5[n=97]), 79.0(SD=16.1[n=36]), 78.8(SD=14.4[n=526]) and 75.8(SD=15.9[n=76]) for MDI, PLGS, HCLS/DIY and pump-no-AID, respectively. Mean life productivity for the Problematic SHEs cohort(n=375) was 58.6(SD=21.3[n=81]), 57.1(SD=21.3[n=33]), 58.9(SD=20.6[n=209]) and 61.1(SD=23.2[n=52]) v. No-SHE cohort(n=1,033), 71.7(SD=19.7[n=146]), 73.6(SD=18.3[n=55]), 72.8(SD=17.1 [n=713]) and 69.0(SD=18.7[n=119]) for MDI, PLGS, HCLS/DIY and pump-no-AID, respectively. Mean work productivity for the Problematic SHEs cohort(n=219) was 72.1(SD=19.2[n=38]), 73.0(SD=18.6[n=22]), 76.1(SD=16.3[n=136]) and 80.9(SD=14.0 [n=23]) v. No-SHE cohort(n=735), 84.6(SD=15.9[n=97]), 85.8(SD=15.8[n=36]), 86.6(SD=13.1[n=526]) and 82.6(SD=15.0[n=76]) for MDI, PLGS, HCLS/DIY and pump-no-AID, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Participants with Problematic SHEs reported greater life and work productivity impairment than those without SHEs, across different insulin-delivery methods.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

PCR259

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×