Survival Benefit of Oral Systemic Monotherapy Treatment in Heavily Pre-Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author(s)

Paly V1, Cremolini C2, Elez E3, Ronnebaum S4, Akin-Fajiye M5, Stefan P6, Elliott J6, Hernandez LG6
1Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 3Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain, 4Evidera, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA, 5Evidera Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is poor and worsens in later lines. Based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the expected survival of patients with ≥2 prior treatment lines receiving best supportive care (BSC) is 4.8–7.1 months. New systemic treatments have recently become available for late-line mCRC. The objective was to characterize the survival benefit associated with oral monotherapies for patients with heavily pre-treated mCRC.

METHODS: A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified six phase 3 RCTs of oral systemic monotherapy treatments+BSC (active treatment) versus placebo+BSC: CONCUR (regorafenib+BSC, N=204), CORRECT (regorafenib+BSC, N=760), FRESCO (fruquintinib+BSC, N=416), FRESCO-2 (fruquintinib+BSC, N=691), RECOURSE (trifluridine/tipiracil+BSC, N=800), and TERRA (trifluridine/tipiracil+BSC, N=406). Differences in median (m) overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for active treatments over placebo+BSC were analyzed using random- and fixed-effects frequentist approaches.

RESULTS: The identified RCTs included populations with 21–73% of patients having progressed after >3 lines of chemotherapy. Across all studies included in the meta-analysis, improvement in mOS following active treatment versus placebo+BSC was 1.86 months (95% CI: 1.30, 2.42 [random effects]) and 1.84 months (1.35, 2.34 [fixed effects]); improvement in mPFS was 0.97 months (0.28, 1.66 [random effects]) and 0.63 (0.56, 0.70 [fixed effects]). Differences between study patient characteristics and when they were conducted are potential limitations of this meta-analysis; however, heterogeneity was low (I2=18.63%). As FRESCO-2 had a more heavily pre-treated population, it was excluded in a sensitivity analysis that demonstrated consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS: Oral systemic monotherapy treatments provide significant survival benefits for heavily pre-treated mCRC, including when used in the fourth-line setting and beyond. In this meta-analysis, the improvement in mOS following active treatment versus placebo+BSC was <2 months, indicating that the increases in mOS with oral systemic monotherapies versus placebo+BSC observed in RCTs, in heavily pre-treated mCRC, are meaningful.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

CO203

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Trials, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons, Performance-based Outcomes

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×