Cost-Effectiveness of Zolbetuximab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma in Taiwan
Author(s)
Huang WM1, Chiang NJ2, Tsai YW3
1National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TPQ, Taiwan, 2Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 3National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TPE, Taiwan
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
Zolbetuximab, the first monoclonal antibody targeting Claudin 18.2, was approved for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJ) by Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding zolbetuximab to chemotherapy (CAPOX or mFOLFOX) versus chemotherapy alone from Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) perspective.METHODS:
Using efficacy data from GLOW and SPOTLIGHT trials, we employed two 3-state partitioned survival models to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of adding zolbetuximab to mFOLFOX or CAPOX over a 10-year horizon. A hypothesized price of zolbetuximab (NT$11,990 per 100 mg per m2) was assigned based on Japan’s MHLW, while chemotherapy and non-medication costs were derived from Taiwan’s NHI claim data. Other parameters were sourced from published literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and compared against the willingness-to-pay threshold (3 times the gross domestic product per capita in 2023, NT$3,023,055). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs were discounted at 3%. Scenario analyses explored the impact of varying zolbetuximab prices. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty.RESULTS:
Based on the hypothesized price, adding zolbetuximab to CAPOX resulted in a 0.38 QALY gain at NT$1,109,392 incremental cost, with an ICER of NT$2,940,727 per QALY and a 55.7% probability of cost-effectiveness. Conversely, adding zolbetuximab to mFOLFOX yielded 0.42 QALY gains at NT$1,705,641 incremental cost, with an ICER of NT$4,024,348 per QALY and a 26.7% probability of cost-effectiveness. A 50% price reduction improved mFOLFOX's ICER to NT$2,938,369 per QALY with a 56.6% probability of cost-effectiveness.CONCLUSIONS:
Adding zolbetuximab to CAPOX is cost-effective at the hypothesized price. However, for adding it to mFOLFOX to be cost-effective, a 50% price reduction is necessary.Conference/Value in Health Info
2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
EE836
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Drugs, Gastrointestinal Disorders, Oncology