Economic Evaluation of Envonalkib, Iruplinalkib, and Critizonib in the Treatment of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China
Author(s)
Yuhang L1, Zhang H2, Yeyou X3, Xiong R3, Liu Y3, Qiu Z3, Hong W3
1Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China, China, 2Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China, 3Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong, China
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Envonalkib, a novel anaplastic lymphoma kinase(ALK) inhibitor, demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity and safety in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the first-in-human phase III study. Iruplinalkib is a second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of envonalkib, iruplinalkib and critizonib in the Chinese healthcare setting.
METHODS: Based on two phase III randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trials comparing envonalkib to critizonib (NCT04009317) and envonalkib to critizonib (NCT03635749) for the treatment of Chinese NSCLC use in ALK-positive patients. A three-health state partitioned survival model (PartSA) was developed to simulate the progression of disease, with model cycle of 3 weeks and a lifetime range; the main output indicators of the model were total cost, quality-adjusted life year(QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER); the cost and health output were discounted using 5.0% discount rate. Using 1~3 times China’s per capita gross domestic product(GDP)(12 295.7~36 887.0 dollar) in 2023 as the willingness-to-pay(WTP) threshold, the cost-utility analysis method was used for analysis, sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to assess model robustness.
RESULTS: The cost of envonalkib iruplinalkib and critizonib were $193 811.2, $232 637.3, and $196 493.6 and the outcomes were 4.62 3.60 and 2.38 QALY, respectively. Envonalkib and iruplinalkib were dominant compared with critizonib, and the ICER of envonalkib compared with iruplinalkib was $16 309.7, which was much greater than WTP; therefore, envonalkib was the most cost-effective option.
CONCLUSIONS: Envonalkib is the more economical compared with iruplinalkib and critizonib at the set price(1161.78 dollar), and iruplinalkib are cost-saving and utility-increasing compared to critizonib, which can help healthcare system in making optimal policies and help clinicians in the medication of patients.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
EE447
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Thresholds & Opportunity Cost, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Disease
Drugs, Oncology