Evaluating the Clinical and Socioeconomic Impact of Improved CKD Diagnosis and Adherence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Australia, Brazil, and China: An Impact CKD Analysis

Author(s)

Rao N1, Wyman CS1, Chen J2, Priest S3, Brown S3, Moura AF4, Zhao MH5, Chadban S6
1AstraZeneca, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK, 2AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 3EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada, 4Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 5Peking University Institute of Nephrology, Beijing, Hebei, China, 6Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated disease, despite the availability of effective interventions. This study aimed to illustrate the clinical and socioeconomic benefits of increased diagnosis and improved adherence to guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) recommended for patients with CKD across countries with varying demographics, health system financing, and access-to-care.

METHODS: In three country settings (Australia, Brazil, and China), simulations were run for 25 years using the IMPACT CKD model to compare key clinical and socioeconomic outcomes between two scenarios: 25% increased diagnosis followed by 75% adherence to GDMT versus current practice. GDMT consisted of kidney protective therapies including glucose‑lowering, lipid‑lowering, antihypertensive, and lifestyle interventions. It was assumed that only patients with access-to-care could be diagnosed and treated, diagnosed patients could be treated with multiple therapies if eligible, and no guideline changes occurred over the time horizon. Treatment effects on estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, cardiovascular (CV) events, and acute kidney injury (AKI) events were assumed multiplicative.

RESULTS: Across the three countries, improved diagnosis, and adherence to GDMT was associated with 25-year cumulative decreases in dialysis, CV events, AKI events, and death by 46%-53%, 17%-28%, 8%-11%, and 5%-6%, respectively. Renal replacement therapy costs were projected to decrease by 39%-45%, with total costs decreasing by 1%-17%. Furthermore, delayed disease progression resulted in projected increases in net workdays, productivity, full-time equivalents, and tax revenue by 3%-8% among employed patients and caregivers. Differences in projected impacts between countries are multifactorial, though are sensitive to demographics and access-to-care.

CONCLUSIONS: This study predicted clinical and socioeconomic benefits from improved diagnosis and GDMT adherence across all three countries. These findings underscore the importance of policy implementation to achieve earlier CKD diagnosis and treatment optimization to reduce the detrimental impacts of CKD on patients, the healthcare system, and society.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

HPR137

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Decision Modeling & Simulation, Novel & Social Elements of Value

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×