Rheumatoid Arthritis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biosimilar Tocilizumab in Spain
Author(s)
Pérez-Ruiz F1, Crespo Diz C2, Crespo C3, Cerezales M4, Guigini MA5, Peinado Fabregat JI6, Schoenenberger JA7, Climente M8
1Hospital de Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain, 2Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain, 3Axentiva Solutions SL, Barcelona, B, Spain, 4Axentiva Solutions, Oviedo, O, Spain, 5Fresenius Kabi España, S.A.U, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 6Fresenius Kabi España, S.A.U, Barcelona, B, Spain, 7Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Lleida, Spain, 8Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar tocilizumab and other available biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs (disease modifying antirheumatic drugs) versus biosimilar infliximab for the treatment of patients suffering moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.
METHODS: A Markov model including the following health states: remission of the disease, low activity, moderate activity, high activity, and death; with a lifetime horizon and from the healthcare system perspective. The model included abatacept, biosimilar adalimumab, baricitinib, certolizumab, etanercept, filgotinib, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, sarilumab, reference and biosimilar tocilizumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib. Efficacy measured by Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 was retrieved from meta-analysis and additional data from clinical trials; Spanish pharmacological costs were obtained from a hospital pharmacy nationwide database, and ancillary healthcare costs from regional published tariffs for medical resources. Deterministic and probabilistic analysis were run, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the cost per percentage of remission and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained were calculated.
RESULTS: The lifetime cost of biosimilar tocilizumab was the cheapest of all the therapeutic alternatives 183,741€ vs certolizumab being the most expensive 201,972€. Percentage of remission and QALYs showed better results for biosimilar adalimumab, certolizumab, reference tocilizumab, biosimilar tocilizumab, sarilumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, and abatacept than biosimilar infliximab. ICERs showed biosimilar tocilizumab as the only therapeutic alternative superior against biosimilar infliximab, being dominant in both cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Biosimilar tocilizumab has proven to be a cost-effective alternative for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients, even against the least expensive available biological or targeted synthetic DMARD comparator in Spain in a lifetime-horizon perspective.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
EE376
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)