Towards a Consensus on Patient-Centered HTA for Rare Diseases in the U.S.: Insights From Global Literature
Author(s)
Chapman R1, Cheng M2, Huang YL3
1The Innovation and Value Initiative, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2Innovation and Value Initiative, Alexandria, VA, USA, 3Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To review recommendations from rare disease literature related to health technology assessment (HTA) to inform the development of a patient-centered framework and checklist for patient engagement in rare disease HTA within the United States. There is a lack of consensus on approaches to conducting patient-centered HTA for rare diseases in the US. This project aims to develop a patient-centered framework and checklist for enhancing patient engagement in rare disease HTA, incorporating relevant recommendations from global literature.
METHODS: A PubMed search identified 279 articles on rare diseases and HTA. An additional seven relevant articles were included through a rolling review process. Among these, 67 articles focused on HTA tools and frameworks. After excluding articles that discussed different HTA agencies, comparisons between HTA agencies in different countries, cost-effectiveness analysis methods, and unrelated topics, 23 articles were reviewed. Common recommendations from these articles were summarized.
RESULTS: Several recommendations have been identified for improving HTA in rare diseases. 1) Leverage various data resources: Utilize qualitative data to identify patient-centered outcomes. 2) Intersect patient-centered and patient-reported outcomes: Finding the intersection of these outcomes is crucial for a comprehensive assessment. 3) Engage stakeholders: Involve different stakeholders from pre-clinical to post-launch comparative effectiveness stages. 4) Adopt a societal perspective: Use a societal perspective in assessments and appraisals. 5) Consider sustainability: Address sustainability in funding rare disease treatments. 6) Apply economic evaluation methods: Use methods such as Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to assess multiple aspects of value. 7) Incorporate product value: Consider product value in pricing and reimbursement decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: The literature search highlights recommendations for addressing gaps and uncertainty in rare disease assessments. We plan to incorporate these insights into a patient-centered HTA framework and checklist to enhance patient engagement in the assessment process of rare diseases.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
PCR122
Topic
Health Technology Assessment, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes, Literature Review & Synthesis, Patient Engagement, Systems & Structure
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Rare & Orphan Diseases