Towards a Consensus on Patient-Centered HTA for Rare Diseases in the U.S.: Insights From Global Literature

Author(s)

Chapman R1, Cheng M2, Huang YL3
1The Innovation and Value Initiative, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2Innovation and Value Initiative, Alexandria, VA, USA, 3Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: To review recommendations from rare disease literature related to health technology assessment (HTA) to inform the development of a patient-centered framework and checklist for patient engagement in rare disease HTA within the United States. There is a lack of consensus on approaches to conducting patient-centered HTA for rare diseases in the US. This project aims to develop a patient-centered framework and checklist for enhancing patient engagement in rare disease HTA, incorporating relevant recommendations from global literature.

METHODS: A PubMed search identified 279 articles on rare diseases and HTA. An additional seven relevant articles were included through a rolling review process. Among these, 67 articles focused on HTA tools and frameworks. After excluding articles that discussed different HTA agencies, comparisons between HTA agencies in different countries, cost-effectiveness analysis methods, and unrelated topics, 23 articles were reviewed. Common recommendations from these articles were summarized.

RESULTS: Several recommendations have been identified for improving HTA in rare diseases. 1) Leverage various data resources: Utilize qualitative data to identify patient-centered outcomes. 2) Intersect patient-centered and patient-reported outcomes: Finding the intersection of these outcomes is crucial for a comprehensive assessment. 3) Engage stakeholders: Involve different stakeholders from pre-clinical to post-launch comparative effectiveness stages. 4) Adopt a societal perspective: Use a societal perspective in assessments and appraisals. 5) Consider sustainability: Address sustainability in funding rare disease treatments. 6) Apply economic evaluation methods: Use methods such as Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to assess multiple aspects of value. 7) Incorporate product value: Consider product value in pricing and reimbursement decisions.

CONCLUSIONS: The literature search highlights recommendations for addressing gaps and uncertainty in rare disease assessments. We plan to incorporate these insights into a patient-centered HTA framework and checklist to enhance patient engagement in the assessment process of rare diseases.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

PCR122

Topic

Health Technology Assessment, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Literature Review & Synthesis, Patient Engagement, Systems & Structure

Disease

Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Rare & Orphan Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×