Comparative Effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Canadians: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Using the Grade Framework
Author(s)
Wang X1, Pahwa A2, Sharma P3, Chitkara A2, Mishra N4, Malmenas M5, Vats S6, Jain P6, Gupta R6, Beck E7, Jayasundara K8, Blake M9
1ICON plc, Taby, AB, Sweden, 2ICON plc, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, 3Icon plc, London, London, UK, 4ICON plc, bengaluru, KA, India, 5ICON plc, Stockholm, Sweden, 6ICON plc, Bangalore, KA, India, 7Moderna, Inc., Munich, BY, Germany, 85Moderna Biopharma Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9Moderna Biopharma Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: As Canada’s public healthcare payers transition to planning COVID-19 vaccine programs in an endemic context, the question of the preferred mRNA vaccine persists. To inform this decision, this systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis assessed the comparative effectiveness of the mRNA‑1273 versus BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines amongst Canadians.
METHODS: An SLR search was conducted in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial (CENTRAL) for studies reporting COVID-19 outcomes with ≥ 2 doses of mRNA vaccines in Canadians aged ≥16 years, considering only English language publications from 2019 onwards. Outcomes of interest included SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to pool risk ratios (RRs) across studies. Heterogeneity was evaluated using chi-squared testing. Certainty of evidence was assessed per the GRADE framework.
RESULTS: There were 11 non-randomized, real-world studies in Canadians aged ≥16 years included in the meta-analysis. Vaccination with mRNA-1273 was associated with lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (mRNA‑1273: 8,369; BNT162b2: 27,864; RR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.60–0.77]), symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (mRNA‑1273: 2,683; BNT162b2: 10,922; RR: 0.74 [95% CI 0.71–0.77]), severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (mRNA‑1273: 482; BNT162b2: 1,227; RR: 0.90 [95% CI 0.73–1.11]) as compared to BNT162b2. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies for SARS-CoV-2 infection (I2 =92%) and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (I2 =63.5%), except symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (I2=0%). Results were generally consistent across subgroups (e.g., residents of long-term care homes, ≥50-year-olds, ≥3 doses [homologous or heterologous series]). Certainty of evidence across outcomes was rated as low (type 3) or very low (type 4), reflecting the lack of randomized-controlled trial data.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 11 observational studies demonstrated statistically significant lower risk of infections, including symptomatic infections, with the mRNA-1273 vaccine versus the BNT162b2 vaccine in Canadians aged ≥16 years.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
CO27
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Literature Review & Synthesis
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory), Vaccines