A Novel Crossover Adjustment Analysis of Overall Survival Results From the Phase 3 ClarIDHy Study of Ivosidenib Versus Placebo in Patients With MIDH1 Cholangiocarcinoma
Author(s)
Prager G1, Masetti L2, Miller P3
1Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Servier Monde, Suresnes, France, 3Miller Economics Ltd, Alderley Edge, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The phase 3 ClarIDHy study assessed overall survival (OS) with ivosidenib versus placebo in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 cholangiocarcinoma. In the original published analysis, when the rank-preserving structural failure time model (RPSFTM) with re-censoring was used for crossover adjustment a significant OS benefit with ivosidenib was reported (hazard ratio (HR)=0.49 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34; 0.70]). This method of crossover adjustment has been questioned for later-line therapies without previously proven OS benefit. Therefore, an external analysis was conducted using other statistical methods to test the robustness of the ClarIDHy RPSFTM-adjusted results.
METHODS: To adjust for the high crossover rate (>70%) in ClarIDHy, an external analysis applied four recommended methods to the published OS results: the RPSFTM (‘treatment group’ without re-censoring and ‘on-treatment’ approaches), inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW), and two-stage estimation (results not shown as this was deemed unviable for crossover adjustment in this highly imbalanced population). The RPSTFM is randomization-based, while IPCW is an observational-based method. The external analyses used individual patient data from the intent-to-treat population. Estimated HRs and 95% CIs of ivosidenib versus placebo were calculated.
RESULTS: The previously published RPSFTM-adjusted results showed that ivosidenib was associated with mortality risk reduction (MRR) versus placebo (HR=0.49 [95% CI: 0.34; 0.70]). The external analysis reported here, showed that ivosidenib was associated with MRR, using the RPSFTM ‘treatment group’ (not re-censored HR=0.52 [95% CI: 0.37; 0.75]), and ‘on-treatment’ approaches (re-censored HR=0.49 [95% CI: 0.28; 0.87]; not re-censored HR=0.52 [95% CI: 0.36; 0.74]). The IPCW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis also showed that ivosidenib was associated with MRR (HR=0.74 [95% CI: 0.35; 1.56]).
CONCLUSIONS: All three crossover adjustment methods applied in this external re-analysis of ClarIDHy data showed that ivosidenib was associated with MRR, consistent with previously published RPSFTM-adjusted results.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
MSR15
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology