Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin for Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in Greece
Author(s)
Koulentaki M1, Vlahakos D2, Tsimihodimos V3, Smyrnaios C4, Delli E4, Karpouzos G4, Kourlaba G5
1ECONCARE LP, Athens, Greece, 2Scientific Advisor and President of the Scientific Council at Bioiatriki Group, Athens, Greece, 3Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, 4Boehringer Ingelheim Hellas, Athens, Greece, 5University of Peloponnese, School of Health Sciences, 44 KIFISSIAS, A1, Greece
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin+Standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone for the management of adult patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in Greece.
METHODS: A Markov state microsimulation model with several health state transitions, over a life-time horizon was locally adapted, from a public payer perspective. Model’s health states were defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification. The evolution of estimated glomerular filtration ratio (eGFR) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR) are used to project CKD progression and the occurrence of a broad range of complications. Patient baseline characteristics, distribution across KDIGO health states, and treatment effects health state dependent in eGFR and uACR were derived from EMPA-KIDNEY trial. Efficacy and safety data were received from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial and public literature. Only direct medical costs related to drug acquisition, disease management and adverse events costs, were considered in the analysis (€,2023). One-way, probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were conducted. Annual discounting rates of 3.5% were applied on costs and outcomes. The time horizon was 50 years.
RESULTS: The analysis showed that over a lifetime horizon, empagliflozin+SoC was associated with additional total cost per patient of €246, compared to SoC alone (€61,944 and €61,698). Combining health and economic outcomes, the incremental analysis showed that empagliflozin+SoC was a cost-effective strategy compared to SoC alone, resulting to an ICER of €255.92 per QALY gained, which is under the defined willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained (i.e two times GDP per capita of Greece). Moreover, findings of sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of base case results highlighting the cost-effective profile of empagliflozin+SoC versus SoC alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin added to SoC was estimated to be a highly cost-effective treatment option for the treatment of adults with CKD compared to Soc in Greece.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
EE111
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders