Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin for Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in Greece

Author(s)

Koulentaki M1, Vlahakos D2, Tsimihodimos V3, Smyrnaios C4, Delli E4, Karpouzos G4, Kourlaba G5
1ECONCARE LP, Athens, Greece, 2Scientific Advisor and President of the Scientific Council at Bioiatriki Group, Athens, Greece, 3Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, 4Boehringer Ingelheim Hellas, Athens, Greece, 5University of Peloponnese, School of Health Sciences, 44 KIFISSIAS, A1, Greece

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin+Standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone for the management of adult patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in Greece.

METHODS: A Markov state microsimulation model with several health state transitions, over a life-time horizon was locally adapted, from a public payer perspective. Model’s health states were defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification. The evolution of estimated glomerular filtration ratio (eGFR) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR) are used to project CKD progression and the occurrence of a broad range of complications. Patient baseline characteristics, distribution across KDIGO health states, and treatment effects health state dependent in eGFR and uACR were derived from EMPA-KIDNEY trial. Efficacy and safety data were received from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial and public literature. Only direct medical costs related to drug acquisition, disease management and adverse events costs, were considered in the analysis (€,2023). One-way, probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were conducted. Annual discounting rates of 3.5% were applied on costs and outcomes. The time horizon was 50 years.

RESULTS: The analysis showed that over a lifetime horizon, empagliflozin+SoC was associated with additional total cost per patient of €246, compared to SoC alone (€61,944 and €61,698). Combining health and economic outcomes, the incremental analysis showed that empagliflozin+SoC was a cost-effective strategy compared to SoC alone, resulting to an ICER of €255.92 per QALY gained, which is under the defined willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained (i.e two times GDP per capita of Greece). Moreover, findings of sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of base case results highlighting the cost-effective profile of empagliflozin+SoC versus SoC alone.

CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin added to SoC was estimated to be a highly cost-effective treatment option for the treatment of adults with CKD compared to Soc in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

EE111

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×