Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Active Ankylosing Spondylitis in Greece

Author(s)

Gourzoulidis G1, Solakidi A2, Psarra M3, Nikitopoulou E2, Tzanetakos C3
1Health Through Evidence, Athens, A1, Greece, 2Pfizer Hellas, Athens, Greece, 3Health Through Evidence, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib compared to currently marketed biologic treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have responded inadequately to conventional therapy (biologic- naïve population) or previous biologic therapy (biologic-experienced population) in Greece.

METHODS: A published model comprising a decision tree and a 3-state Markov model was adapted from a public payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Adalimumab and secukinumab, having the highest market shares among biologics for the treatment of AS in Greece (standard practice) were selected as comparators in the analysis. Clinical parameters captured treatment response defined per ASAS20, short-term and long-term changes in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) scores long-term biologic treatment discontinuation, and adverse events. Efficacy, safety data and utility values were elicited from published literature. Direct costs pertaining to drug acquisition, monitoring, adverse events and disease management costs were considered in the analysis (€,2022). Model outcomes were patients’ quality-adjusted life years (QALY), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).All future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum.A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted to account for model uncertainty.

RESULTS: In biologic-naïve population, compared to adalimumab, tofacitinib produced an estimated 0.06 additional QALYs (10.67 vs 10.73), at additional costs of €2,403 (€147,096 vs €149,500) resulting in an ICER of €41,378 per QALY gained. In biologic-experienced population, the total cost per patient for tofacitinib and secukinumab was estimated to be €151,371 and €145,757 respectively. In terms of health outcomes, tofacitinib was associated with 0.13, increment in QALYs compared with secukinumab resulting in an ICER of €42,784 per QALY gained. PSA confirmed the deterministic results for both populations.

CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib was estimated to be a cost-effective option for the treatment of active AS in Greece for both biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE40

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×