Innovative Direct-to-Physician Retrospective Chart Review Approach: Synthesized Learnings from Completed and Ongoing
Author(s)
Brett N1, Kent C2, Kiure A3, Capart P4, Rouleau A4
1PPD, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Saint Laurent, QC, Canada, 2PPD, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, FL, USA, 3PPD, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Boston, MA, USA, 4PPD, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paris, Île-de-France, France
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Site-based medical chart review studies collect retrospective real-world evidence (RWE) when existing data sources are not available/relevant. Challenges include timescale inflexibilities, site burden and cost. A direct-to-physician chart review methodology may address these challenges. However, it is important to understand considerations and use-case scenarios for this approach. The objective was to describe recently undertaken direct-to-physician studies to inform researchers on appropriate use-cases, study design considerations, and share synthesized metrics and learnings.
METHODS: A review of 4 US-based direct-to-physician studies (2 completed, 2 ongoing) was undertaken to evaluate objectives, population, outcome measures/variables, and key milestone metrics.
RESULTS: Of the 4 historical cohort studies, 2 were natural history studies, 1 was a drug utilization study and 1 was a drug effectiveness/safety study. 1 study investigated patients with a rare pediatric disease and 3 investigated patients who failed treatment lines for oncology indications. Data collected included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, adverse events and healthcare resource utilization. Patient follow-up was ≤2-3 years. Studies received ethics approval ≤1 month of submission, and the 2 completed studies had high-quality efficient data collection timeframes (2-3 months), with low missingness of patient characteristics (< 5%), expectedly varied visit frequency among patients, and descriptive outcome analyses. Key considerations for direct-to-physician studies include sample size (≤approximately 150-200 patients), patients are treated by the physicians’ network, and variables are expected to be found in treating physician’s medical records. Direct-to-physician study limitations include, few countries where direct-to-physician studies can be conducted, limited breadth of therapeutic areas, and somewhat restricted chart abstraction time.
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, direct-to-physician retrospective chart review design was time-efficient for generating RWE to inform rare disease/condition management or to understand drug utilization and benefit-risk. When deciding whether to perform a direct-to-physician study, it is imperative to examine the methodologic considerations to ensure appropriateness of design in the selected country.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
SA5
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinician Reported Outcomes, Electronic Medical & Health Records
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology