DISCOVERING THE COSTS OF USING DIFFERENT MAPPING ALGORITHMS

Published Jan 6, 2015
Sheffield, UK – In its Reference Case, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) states that where many algorithms exist, their effect on the results should be investigated, yet this has not been routinely done in economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To produce a cost per quality-adjusted life year, economic models require utility values – a measure of health-related quality of life. These measures of utility are not routinely included in trials for RA, so algorithms are often used to convert the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to utilities. Researchers from the University of Sheffield reviewed the literature and identified 24 different algorithms that have been or could be used to map from the HAQ to the EQ-5D (a measure of utility). They used all 24 of the different algorithms in the same RA model and compared the results. As a result, the researchers found that using different mapping algorithms led to results which varied above and below crucial willingness-to-pay thresholds, meaning the choice of algorithm could determine whether a drug is recommended. Lead author Becky Pennington, MSc, a health economist at BresMed concluded: “The use of different algorithms could lead health technology assessment bodies to make different decisions regarding reimbursement.” Consequently, the wrong choice of algorithm could substantially cost the heath technology assessment body through reimbursement approval of a cost-ineffective drug, or the manufacturer in losing sales of a cost-effective drug. The full study, “Mapping from the Health Assessment Questionnaire to the EQ-5D: The Impact of Different Algorithms on Cost-Effectiveness Results,” is published in Value in Health.

Related Stories

Advancing the Economics of Mental Health: A Global Perspective

Mar 12, 2025

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers exploring mental health economics, highlighting impacts on caregivers, productivity, and interventions’ cost-effectiveness.

Generative AI Set to Reshape Health Technology Assessment, ISPOR Report Finds

Feb 11, 2025

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of an ISPOR Working Group Report that provides an introduction to the uses of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in health technology assessment (HTA).

ISPOR Tackles Health Disparities with New Research Primer

Jan 22, 2025

ISPOR announced today the publication of a report from the ISPOR Health Equity Research Special Interest Group intended to establish key concepts for conducting health equity research that enables investigators to examine—and ultimately reduce—unfair social inequities in health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×