Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines: Baltic (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia)
Country/Region: Baltic (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f3e0/7f3e08b99a1a2610a98cd00141785e995416e6f6" alt=""
PE Guidelines
Baltic guideline for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals (Pharmacoeconomic Analysis) (2002)
PDF in English
PDF in English
Information current as of Tuesday, July 19, 2022
Key Features
Key Features | |
---|---|
Type of Guidelines | PE Guidelines |
Title and year of the document | Baltic guideline for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals (Pharmacoeconomic Analysis) (2002) |
Affiliation of authors | Experts from health authorities of the Baltic countries |
Purpose of the document | Drug reimbursement and other state funding decisions |
Standard reporting format included | No |
Disclosure | Yes |
Target audience of funding/ author's interests | Pharmaceutical companies. Baltic states’ health authority |
Perspective | Mainly health care perspective. If relevant, societal |
Indication | Approved one(s) |
Target population | Yes |
Subgroup analysis | Yes |
Choice of comparator | Most commonly used alternative or practice. Be justified. |
Time horizon | To model a sufficient analysis period when trial data provide too short a time frame |
Assumptions required | Not stated |
Preferred analytical technique | Any one of CMA, CEA, CUA. Need justification. |
Costs to be included | Only direct health care costs. If relevant, include all costs outside healthcare system, presented separately. |
Source of costs | Adapt local cost. Be specified. |
Modeling | Yes, requires details |
Systematic review of evidences | Encourage meta-analysis |
Preference for effectiveness over efficacy | Prefer data from RCTs |
Preferred outcome measure | Change in the health state. Absolute risk difference calculated |
Preferred method to derive utility | EuroQol, Health Utility Index |
Equity issues stated | Not stated |
Discounting costs | Yes, 5% justify for other rates |
Discounting outcomes | Yes, 5% |
Sensitivity analysis-parameters and range | Main assumption variables, confidence interval |
Sensitivity analysis-methods | Details of the statistical tests performed |
Presenting results | C/E ratio, ICER, total annual cost and benefit |
Incremental analysis | Yes |
Total costs vs effectiveness (cost/effectiveness ratio) | Yes |
Portability of results (Generalizability) | Adjustment needed |
Financial impact analysis | No |
Mandatory or recommended or voluntary |
Acknowledgement: