Abstract

Objectives

Decision models for economic evaluation are increasingly including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for informal/unpaid carers, but these estimates often come from poor quality data and typically rely on cross-sectional analysis. We aimed to identify within-person effects using longitudinal analysis of 13 waves of Understanding Society (the UK Household Longitudinal Survey).

Methods

We analyzed data for coresident carer and care-recipient dyads, where the carer reported “looking after or giving special help to” the care recipient in any of the 13 waves. We used fixed-effects models to study the effects of caring for the care recipient (the “caregiving” effect) using volume of care (hours per week) and continuous duration of caregiving (years) and caring about the care recipient (the “family” effect) using the care recipient’s HRQoL on the carer’s HRQoL. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form 6 Dimension, calculated from the Short Form 12.

Results

We found consistent evidence for the family effect: improving care recipient’s HRQoL by 0.1 would improve carer’s HRQoL by approximately 0.012. We also consistently found evidence of a small but statistically significant decrement to carer’s HRQoL for each additional year of caring. These findings were robust to scenario analyses. Evidence for the relationship between volume of care and carer’s HRQoL was less clear.

Conclusions

We propose that our estimates can be used to populate economic models to predict changes in carers’ HRQoL over time and allow disutilities to be estimated separately for the family and caregiving effect.