Cost-Utility of Ribociclib As the First-Line Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor Positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Negative Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer in Colombia

Author(s)

Gamboa Ó1, Díaz Ortega M2, Herrera D2, Barbosa D2, Montenegro E2
1SIIES, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia, 2NOVARTIS, Oncology Business Unit, Bogotá, D.C., CUN, Colombia

Presentation Documents

Objective: To estimate the cost-utility of the currently approved Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as the first-line treatment in postmenopausal women with Hormone Receptor positive (HR+) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 negative (HER2-) advanced/metastatic breast cancer, from the perspective of the Colombian health system.

Methods: A partitioned survival model was built with pre-progression, post-progression and death health states, according to the areas under the curve for the survival functions, with a 40-year time horizon. Direct medical costs for medicines and their administration, monitoring, handling of adverse events and terminal care were included. The sources of costs were SISMED, drug pricing regulations, tariff manuals ISS+SOAT and the sufficiency database; a local clinical expert validated resource usage. The probabilities of the events were based on a systematic review and the hazard ratios of survival were estimated with an indirect comparison meta-analysis. Health utility values were extracted from the literature. Health effects were valued as Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied for costs and outcomes. Uncertainty about cost-effectiveness was evaluated in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis considering a willingness to pay threshold of one-time gross domestic product per capita, year 2020 (COP$ 21.307.193).

Results: In the base case, expected average values per patient are: COP$ 301.531.546 / 3.34 QALY for ribociclib+letrozole, COP$ 345.366.222 / 3.17 QALY for palbociclib+letrozole and COP$ 320.666.069 / 3.19 QALY for abemaciclib+letrozole. Among CDK4/6i+letrozole, ribociclib+letrozole is a dominant alternative since it has a lower cost and greater effectiveness. In the sensitivity analysis, the probability that ribociclib+letrozole is cost-effective compared with palbociclib+letrozole and abemaciclib+letrozole is 76% and 53%, respectively.

Conclusions: Ribociclib+letrozole is a cost-effective and cost-saving alternative among CDK4/6i+letrozole, as first-line treatment in postmenopausal women with HR+ and HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer, from the perspective of the Colombian health system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE372

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×