EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LURASIDONE AND OTHER ATYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENTS FOR BIPOLAR DEPRESSION: UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSES

Author(s)

Williams R1, Dembek C1, Heller V2, Singh R3, Hagi K4, Nosaka T4, Loebel A5
1Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Marlborough, MA, USA, 2IQVIA, Stockholm, Sweden, 3IQVIA, Thane, MH, India, 4Sumitomo Dannipon Pharma, Tokyo, Japan, 5Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Fort Lee, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Since publication of a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the efficacy and safety of lurasidone with atypical antipsychotic monotherapies for the treatment of acute bipolar depression among adults, new clinical trial data have been released. The purpose of this study was to update an NMA comparing the efficacy and safety of lurasidone with all other atypical antipsychotic monotherapies in adult patients with bipolar depression.

METHODS: A SLR and NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was updated as of August 2018 using Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov, recent abstracts, and press releases. Outcomes included the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions–Bipolar Disorder–Severity (CGI-BP-S) scale, weight gain, somnolence, akathisia, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and all-cause discontinuation. Mean differences in change from baseline and mean odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals were calculated.

RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs of lurasidone, quetiapine (IR or XR), aripiprazole, olanzapine, ziprasidone and cariprazine for the treatment of bipolar depression were included. Lurasidone was significantly more efficacious than cariprazine (MADRS: -2.91 [-5.57, -0.20], CGI-BP-S: -0.44 [-0.74, -0.14]), aripiprazole (MADRS: -3.62 [-6.89, -0.36], CGI-BP-S: -0.42 [-0.77, -0.07]), and ziprasidone (MADRS: -3.37 [-6.49, -0.23], CGI-BP-S: -0.59 [-0.93, -0.24]). Lurasidone had similar efficacy vs olanzapine and quetiapine. Lurasidone had less weight gain than olanzapine (-2.54kg [-3.36, -1.72]), quetiapine (-0.83kg [-1.55, -0.12]), and cariprazine (-0.40kg [-1.30, 0.49]), and less somnolence than ziprasidone (OR: 0.28 [0.09, 0.66]) and quetiapine (OR: 0.32 [0.11, 0.68]). Rates of akathisia, EPS, and all-cause discontinuation were similar.

CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the previous NMA, lurasidone was efficacious and well-tolerated. The updated NMA showed lurasidone was more efficacious than cariprazine, aripiprazole, and ziprasidone among adults with acute bipolar depression. Lurasidone also had less weight gain than olanzapine and quetiapine, and less somnolence than quetiapine and ziprasidone.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PMH5

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×