Targeted Literature Review of in-Trial/Exit Interviews in Clinical Trials Focusing on Multiple Myeloma and Related Conditions

Author(s)

Cala ML1, Cherepanov D1, Vong K2, Cureg B2, Zhang S2, Johnson N3
1Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Lumanity, Boston, MA, USA, 3Lumanity, Bethesda, MD, USA

OBJECTIVES: To understand methods implemented and topics collected as part of in-trial/exit interviews in clinical trial patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and related conditions.

METHODS: A targeted literature review was performed in October/November 2023 using keyword searches and handsearching/snowballing techniques to identify publications mentioning in-trial/exit interviews with patients with MM or related conditions in the past 10 years. Databases searched: MEDLINE®, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, International Society for Quality of Life Research, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, and Drugs@FDA.

RESULTS: Of the 469 sources identified (440 articles/conference abstracts; 24 drug approval packages; 5 from handsearching/snowballing), 54 sources were fully reviewed. Of these, 10 sources contained information about in-trial/exit interviews in MM or related conditions (i.e., large B-cell lymphoma) from clinical trials: KarMMa (n=4; Phase 2, Europe/Canada/Japan/US), DREAMM-2 (n=3; Phase 2, Australia/Canada/Europe/US), CARTITUDE-1 (n=2; Phase 1b/2, Japan/US), and one source informing both TRANSCENDWORLD (Phase 2; Europe/Japan) and PLATFORM (n=1; Phase 1/2, US). All 10 sources were published in 2017 or 2018; interviews were optional, semi-structured using an interview guide, conducted in-person or via telephone, and in the patient’s native language (e.g., English, Spanish, French, German or Italian for DREAMM-2). Timing of interviews included a combination of pre-treatment, in-trial, exit, and/or post-treatment; interview topics included baseline signs/symptoms, meaningful change description for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), treatment impacts and expectations, treatment experience, health and wellbeing changes, treatment-related side effects/adverse events, and severity/bother of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that information collected from in-trial/exit interviews can inform study objectives and exploratory endpoints in clinical trials in MM, underscoring the value of these interviews when implemented alongside PROMs. Incorporating in-trial/exit interviews into clinical studies can provide important insights into many aspects of patients’ experiences and perceptions, and inform the overall benefit:risk profile of a novel investigational therapy.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

PCR241

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×