Cost-Consequences Analysis (CCA) of Artificially Intelligent Clinician-Friendly Interpretable Computer-Aided Diagnosis (ICADX) Tool for the Detection of Preterm Births (OB-GYN) Developed at Hosmartai (Horizon 2020 Funded)

Author(s)

Chatzikou M1, Latsou D1, Logaras E2, Rigas E2, Kyparissidis Kokkinidis I2, Tsakiridis I3, Dagklis T3, Billis A2, Bamidis PD2
1PharmEcons Easy Access Ltd, York, A1, UK, 2Laboratory of Medical Physics and Digital Innovation, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 33rd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

OBJECTIVES: Preterm delivery contributes to an increased risk of fetal and maternal death and several health deficiencies. Diagnosis of preterm delivery in advance is important to avoid or minimize its undesirable consequences to the baby and the mother. Data-driven decision-making using AI algorithms has been increasingly common in the obstetrics field by providing improved diagnostic accuracy and automated, standardized interpretation and inference processes. CADXpert OB-GYN uses clinically validated models that can efficiently predict Pre-term birth using data from standard clinical practice. The study evaluated the economic and clinical performance of the AI-web based predictive model on the accurate detection of preterm births.

METHODS: A micro-costing analysis, based on costs of the Greek healthcare system, was performed to identify the costs of development of the new AI technology and an array of the most important indicators to enable performance identification. The most important KPIs were clinical performance, and user satisfaction. The analysis of costs and consequences was performed incrementally between the current practice and the new AI technology.

RESULTS: Although the new AI technology imposes extra costs of €12.142 annually, this cost is counterbalanced by the clinical performance with a ROC-AUC of 83% and recall of 94%, indicating that almost all positive cases are correctly identified, and the possibility of earlier detection of premature birth by 6 weeks in favor of the new AI technology vs. current practice (28 weeks vs. 34 weeks). A conservative estimation of potential savings of €155.794 on an annual basis could be considered the baseline. The system usability score of the new technology was 71.50%. The new AI technology required fewer human resources for the review of the examination.

CONCLUSIONS: AI could automate parts of the process providing improved accuracy, with less human resources, resulting in savings for the healthcare systems.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

MT36

Topic

Medical Technologies

Disease

Medical Devices, Pediatrics

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×