Q-TWiST Analysis Is Back in the Game in Oncology Clinical Trial Analysis: A Recent Trend

Author(s)

Mohseninejad L1, Srivastava T2, Gautam R3, Purkayastha P4, Yang K5, Lévy V6
1BeiGene Netherlands B.V., Den Haag, ZH, Netherlands, 2ConnectHEOR, London, UK, 3ConnectHEOR, SLOUGH, BKM, UK, 4ConnectHEOR, Delhi, India, 5BeiGene USA, Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA, 6Hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP et Université Sorbonne, Paris Nord, France

OBJECTIVES: Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) is a clinical tool that integrates progression, survival, treatment toxicities, and patient quality of life into a single metric. It is useful for analyzing the results of randomized trials as a complement to the results obtained from the originator. Although Q-TWiST was introduced >3 decades ago, information on its recent use in cancer therapies is limited.

METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted using the PubMed database to identify Q-TWiST studies in oncology therapies from January 2020 to May 2023. Both full-text papers and conference abstracts were included.

RESULTS: A total of 18 studies reporting 19 unique Q-TWiST analyses were included (15 of 103 records retrieved from searches; 3 from bibliographic searches). The reported Q-TWiST analyses were most associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, renal cell carcinoma, and ovarian cancer, each accounting for 16% (n=3) of the included studies. The predominant health states used in these analyses were time with toxicity (TOX; 100% [n=19]), time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (TWiST; 100% [n=19]), and time from disease progression to death/censoring (REL; 84% [n=16]). The most frequently employed utility weights were 0.5 for TOX (47% [n=9]), 1.0 for TWiST (74% [n=14]), and 0.5 for REL (47% [n=9]). The sources of the utility weights varied. Approximately 26% (n=5) were derived from published literature, 26% (n=5) were estimated from clinical trials, and 42% (n=8) employed threshold analysis. In the base-case analysis, TOX was predominantly defined as involving grade ≥3 adverse events (79% [n=15]), with an additional 11% (n=2) considering grade ≥2 adverse events. However, in scenario/sensitivity analyses, there was considerable variation in the definition of TOX.

CONCLUSIONS: Q-TWiST analysis has been of increasing interest in cancer treatment evaluation and as a valuable decision-making tool to facilitate assessment of risk-benefit trade-offs, further enhancing the understanding of treatment impacts on patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

CO130

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×