Choice of Recommended Treatment Options for Patients with Hepatitis C Genotype 1 in Moscow, Russian Federation

Author(s)

Gorkavenko F1, Trifonova AA2, Khachatryan G3, Omelyanovskiy V3, Nikitina A4, Vasileva Y3
1Center of Healthcare Quality Assesment and Control, Moscow, MOW, Russia, 2Center of Healthcare Quality Assesment and Control, Moscow, Russian Federation, 3Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, 4Center of Healthcare Quality Assesment and Control, Moscow, Russia

OBJECTIVES: The possibilities of modern therapy for chronic hepatitis C include a large number of options that have marked differences in both effectiveness and cost. The aim of this study was to select optimal treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 for reimbursement in Moscow in 2020 based on their comparative efficacy and costs per course.

METHODS: Treatment regimens were ranked based on their comparative efficacy and costs per course. Comparative efficacy was evaluated based on published network meta-analyses, as well as our own indirect comparisons. Prices for drugs were provided by the Moscow Healthcare Department. When determining the target sub-groups of patients, the virus genotype, the presence or absence of treatment experience and liver cirrhosis were taken into account. List of comparators included pangenotypic and non-pangenotypic regimens, with the exception of regimens containing peginterferons.

RESULTS: Based on the results of the analysis, several recommended schemes were selected for each of the target groups. Multilple regimens were recommended due to the fact that the cost of the course of treatment and the efficacy of all top regimens were comparable. In genotype 1a patients independent of subgroups top-3 regimens were: daclatasvir+sofosbuvir±ribavirin (€ 5938 per course), grasoprevir+elbasvir (€ 5964) and velpatasvir+sofosbuvir (€ 6223). The 4th and 5th positions in treatment-naïve and experienced patients without cirrhosis was dasabuvir+ombitasvir+paritaprevir+ritonavir+ribavirin (€ 6237) and glecaprevir+pibrentasvir (€ 6333). The 4th regimen for treatment-naïve cirrhotic patients was glecaprevir+pibrentasvir (€ 6333). In genotype 1b patients independent of subgroups top-4 regimens were: daclatasvir+sofosbuvir±ribavirin (€ 5938), grasoprevir+elbasvir (€ 5964), dasabuvir+ombitasvir+paritaprevir+ritonavir (€ 6219) and velpatasvir+sofosbuvir (€6223). The 5th regimen for all target groups, except treatment-experienced cirrhotic patients was glecaprevir+pibrentasvir (€ 6333).

CONCLUSIONS: As a result of a transparent and scientific-based analysis were selected treatment regimens for patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 recommended for reimbursement in Moscow in 2020.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PIN26

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×