Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart Twice Daily Versus BASAL-Bolus Full Regimen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Algeria.

Author(s)

Sellam Y1, Malek R2, Semrouni M3, Belhadj M4, Zekri S5, Brouri M5, Arbouche Z3, Nouri N6
1Pharmacy Department, Algiers University 1, Algiers, 16, Algeria, 2Internal Medicine Department, CHU Setif, Setif, Algeria, 3Endocrinology & Diabetology Department, CHU Beni Messous, Algiers, Algeria, 4Internal Medicine & Diabetology Department, EHU Oran, Oran, Algeria, 5Internal Medicine Department, EPH Birtraria, Algiers, Algeria, 6Endocrinology & Diabetology Department, CHU Constantine, Constantine, Algeria

OBJECTIVES: While due to the progressive nature of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), patients usually require treatment intensification, fixed combinations of short and long acting insulin can offer a convenient alternative to Basal-Bolus insulin regimen. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 70% Insulin Degludec / 30% Insulin Aspart co-formulation administered twice daily (IDegAsp BID) versus Basal-Bolus full regimen (IGlar+ IAsp, four injections per day) in Algerian patients treated for T2DM. METHODS: Data derived from a treat-to-target noninferiority trial, and the BAROMETER real-world nationwide study, were used to populate a simple and transparent short-term cost-effectiveness model (DACE Excel-based model). Costs covered insulin, needles, Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) strips and lancets, healthcare resources utilization and indirect costs associated with hypoglycemia. Effects included disutilities of hypoglycemia, SMBG testing, and BMI gain, as well as mortality risk after severe hypoglycemic event. Costs and effects of IDegAsp BID versus Basal-Bolus full regimen were discounted at 3.5% rate, and compared over a 5-year period. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) was conducted to assess the degree of uncertainty and robustness of the results obtained. RESULTS: Over a 5-year time horizon, the base-case incremental cost of IDegAsp BID versus Basal-Bolus full regimen was estimated to DZD -53,253.13 (all costs), and DZD -6,866.06 (without indirect costs). Savings were mainly driven by SMBG, needles and hypoglycemia. The incremental effectiveness was 0.289 gained Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and 0.020 gained Life Years (LYs). The PSA demonstrated that the probability of IDegAsp BID being cost-effective relative to Basal-Bolus full regimen is 93.9% (all costs), and 93.4% (without indirect costs), assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1,401,649 DZD per QALY (3 times GDP per capita). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that IDegAsp BID is a cost-effective alternative for treatment of T2DM in Algeria compared with Basal-Bolus full regimen, from both payer and societal perspectives.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PDB37

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×