How Well Can Insurers Police Off-Label Use? Evidence from GLP-1s in Medicare Part D

Author(s)

Levy J1, Gu X2, Allsop K3, Ippolito BN4
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Ellicott City, MD, USA, 3Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, 4American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, USA

OBJECTIVES: Semaglutide, is a GLP-1 molecule FDA-approved to treat Type 2 Diabetes(Ozempic), while the same molecule also approved to treat Obesity(Wegovy). Medicare Part D plans may cover Ozempic, but are prohibited from covering Wegovy, creating an obvious demand for off-label prescriptions of Ozempic. Beyond legal prohibitions, allowing off-label prescribing would increase plan costs and generate adverse selection, putting an insurer at a competitive disadvantage. Our study provides early evidence on off-label use of Ozempic in Medicare.

METHODS: Using a 20% sample of Part D patients from 2018-2021. We identify patient’s first fill for Ozempic and determine the likelihood of off-label use based on past and future claims. Our criteria consider both the existence of diagnosis codes for diabetes and prescription fills of non-Semaglutide diabetic medicines. Prescriptions without clear evidence of diabetes were considered possibly off-label. We compared the rate of such fills across patient and plan characteristics.

RESULTS: We identified 138,128 first administrations of Ozempic, 32,408(23.46%) had no previously recorded code for diabetes and 14,973(10.8%) had no previous drug claim for any diabetes medication. 6,760(4.89%) had neither a previous diagnosis claim nor a previous diabetic medication fill. Patients whose first use was identified as ‘possibly off-label’, received a greater amount of Ozempic(9.2MG vs 7.8MG), paid more out-of-pocket $87 vs $77), and more likely to be on Medicare Advantage.

Plan features, including tier, coverage, and utilization management were all similar for on versus off-label patients. Of patients who received Ozempic possibly off-label, 3,122 (46.2% of 6,760 and 2.26% overall) continued to have no diagnosis code or non-Ozempic diabetes diagnosis filled in our observed follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results present early evidence that there is some off-label use of Ozempic in the Medicare program. However, important caveats about the ability of claims data to examine off-label use, including the comprehensiveness and fidelity of diagnosis codes apply.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

HPR104

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×