Safety of PDE-5 Inhibitors for Erectile Dysfunction: Descriptive and Disproportionality Analyses of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database from 2010 to 2022

Author(s)

Shin YE1, Rojanasarot S2, Hincapie AL1, Guo JJ1
1University of Cincinnati, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors are often used as a first-line therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). This study identifies characteristics of adverse events (AEs) and any potential safety signals associated with PDE-5 inhibitors used for ED from a post-marketing safety surveillance program.

METHODS: A descriptive analysis was conducted for all AEs reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for four PDE-5 inhibitors (avanafil, sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) indicated for ED between January 2010 and June 2022. The frequency of reported outcomes and the most reported AEs were found. A disproportionality analysis using proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and information component (IC) was also conducted for the most common and clinically important AEs.

RESULTS: A total of 29,176 AEs were reported for the PDE-5 inhibitors indicated for ED in the FAERS database during the study period. The average age of patients was 58.79 years. The most reported outcomes were other serious events with 6,707 events (67.21%) and hospitalization with 1,947 events (19.51%). The most reported AE was ‘drug ineffective,’ with 6,994 reports (23.97%). Seven safety signals were detected across the drugs. For sildenafil, a key safety signal was ‘death’ (PRR 3.19 [2.51, 4.04], ROR 3.24 [2.55, 4.11], IC 0.51). For tadalafil, key signals were ‘hearing loss/impairment’ (PRR 2.50 [1.97, 3.18], ROR 2.53 [1.99, 3.22], IC 0.68) and ‘priapism’ (PRR 3.62 [2.11, 6.23], ROR 3.64 [2.12, 6.26], IC 0.86). For vardenafil, ‘drug administration error’ (PRR 3.33 [2.27, 4.89], ROR 3.39 [2.29, 5.02], IC 1.61) was an important signal.

CONCLUSIONS: PDE-5 inhibitors demonstrate significant increased risks of reporting certain clinically important AEs. While these events are rare, it is imperative to continually monitor PDE-5 inhibitor use at the primary care to national surveillance levels to ensure safe utilization.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EPH140

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×