Real-World Healthcare Costs of Patients Receiving Dolutegravir/Lamivudine and Other Single Tablet Regimens for the Treatment of HIV-1 in the US
Author(s)
Priest J1, Germain G2, Laliberte F3, Duh MS4, Mahendran M5, Fakih I6, Oglesby A7
1ViiV Healthcare, Durham, NC, USA, 2Groupe d’analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Groupe d’analyse, Ltée, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Analysis Group, Boston, MA, USA, 5Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 6Analysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 7ViiV Healthcare, RTP, NC, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) is a two-drug regimen FDA-approved in 2019 and currently, the lowest priced single-tablet regimen (STR) based on wholesale acquisition costs. This study evaluates healthcare costs of DTG/3TC users compared to current standard of care three- or four-drug STRs. METHODS This retrospective study used IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus claims (1/1/2015–3/31/2020) from US adult patients with a diagnosis of HIV, ≥1 dispensing of DTG/3TC, ABC/DTG/3TC, BIC/FTC/TAF, EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF, or DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF on or after 04/08/2019 (approval of DTG/3TC for HIV; index date=first dispensing), and ≥6 months of continuous eligibility pre-index. All-cause and HIV-related healthcare costs were reported per-patient-per-month (PPPM) to account for varying lengths of follow-up. Adjusted cost ratios (aCR) were estimated using multivariate models adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. Analyses were further stratified by treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced. RESULTS A total of 22,061 patients met study criteria (590 DTG/3TC, 4,355 ABC/DTG/3TC, 9,068 BIC/FTC/TAF, 7,081 EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF, and 967 DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF). Mean age was similar across all cohorts (45.6–46.3 years) and mean follow-up period ranged 4.4–9.5 months. Mean all-cause total healthcare costs PPPM were significantly lower for DTG/3TC users compared to users of BIC/FTC/TAF ($3,368 vs. $3,783; aCR:0.77), EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF ($3,368 vs $3,456; aCR:0.70), and DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF ($3,368 vs. $4,029; aCR:0.78; all p<0.001), and similar to users of ABC/DTG/3TC ($3,368 vs. $3,322; aCR:0.97; p = 0.689). Across all comparisons, cost differences were primarily driven by significantly lower pharmacy costs (BIC/FTC/TAF: $2,595 vs. $3,116, aCR:0.76; EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF: $2,595 vs. $2,965, aCR:0.75; DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF: $2,595 vs. $3,558, aCR:0.69; ABC/DTG/3TC: $2,595 vs. $2,760, aCR:0.83; all p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed among the subgroups of treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with DTG/3TC had substantially lower (22–30%) healthcare costs compared to current standard of care STRs, although similar costs to ABC/DTG/3TC, highlighting the economic benefits of its use with sustained management of HIV infection.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)
Code
PIN15
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)