Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Receiving Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors

Author(s)

Lin CW1, To TM2, Ng C2, Gupta R2, Ogale S2
1Genentech, Inc., Millbrae, CA, USA, 2Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: In the phase III ALEX study, alectinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival over crizotinib for treatment-naïve patients with ALK+ NSCLC. This study aims to evaluate health resource utilization (HRU) and costs for patients receiving alectinib or crizotinib as the first ALK inhibitor (ALKi).

METHODS: This retrospective observational study identified patients ≥ 18 years old with lung cancer (ICD-9: 162, ICD-10: C34) receiving their first ALKi between 1/1/2015 and 6/30/2019 from PharMetrics Plus claims database. Patients were required to have continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment 6 months before and 12 months after the first ALKi initiation date (index date) and no prior ALKi treatment during the 6 months pre-index. HRU and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs (reported in 2019 USD) during the 12 months post-index were summarized by index ALKi. A multivariate generalized linear model with log-link and gamma distribution was applied to estimate total cost of care, adjusting for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS: The study included 53 alectinib and 124 crizotinib patients. In the 12 months post-index, alectinib patients were less likely to have any emergency department (ED) and inpatient visits compared with crizotinib patients (ED: 24.5% vs 40.3%, p=0.044; inpatient: 22.6% vs 41.3%, p=0.019). Although ALKi pharmacy costs were similar (unadjusted PPPM cost: $12,749 vs $12,825, p=0.933), total cost of care was lower for alectinib patients than for crizotinib patients (unadjusted PPPM cost: $18,461 vs $21,307, p=0.069]. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, total cost of care for alectinib patients was 19.5% lower than crizotinib patients (adjusted PPPM cost: $15,536 vs $19,303, p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients receiving alectinib as the first ALKi had approximately 20% lower mean adjusted total cost of care compared with patients receiving crizotinib. This real-world economic evidence supplements clinical benefits from the ALEX study, supporting the use of alectinib as the first ALKi in ALK+ NSCLC patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN70

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×