COMPARATIVE QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES OF DOLUTEGRAVIR-BASED OR EFAVIRENZ-BASED ANTIRETOVIRAL TREATMENT IN PREGNANCY FOR LATE PRESENTORS BETWEEN THE 3RD TRIAL-MESTER AND 48 WEEKS POSTPARTUM

Author(s)

Perez Nicholas O1, Lamorde M1, Kintu K1, Wang D2, Chen T2, Malaba T3, Myer L4, Waitt C5, Reynolds H5, Khoo S5
1Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda, 2Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK, 3University of Cape Town, Cape Town , South Africa, 4University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 5University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

OBJECTIVES: Evidence on safety and health related quality of life outcomes is needed for rollout of new antiretroviral therapies. Dolutegravir-based treatment is being rolled out as the preferred first-line treatment for HIV in many low- and middle-income countries. We compared HRQoL between treatment-naïve pregnant women randomized to dolutegravir-based or efavirenz-base regimen in Uganda and South Africa.

METHODS: As part of the DoIPHIN-2 RCT, HRQoL data was gathered from 203 pregnant women mean age 28years, randomized to dolutegravir (101) and efavirenz (102). The medical outcomes study-HIV health survey was used at baseline, 24weeks and 48weeks between years 2017 and 2019. Physical health summary and mental health summary scores were primary-endpoints, while the 11 MOS-HIV subscales were secondary-endpoints. Pairwise t-tests were followed by ANCOVA analysis for within-group and between-group comparisons. Standardized multivariate regressions were included to associate selected-variables and MOS-HIV sub-scales with PHS and MHS scores.

RESULTS: After 24weeks postpartum, significant improvements were seen in dolutegravir-treatment; PHS-scores (11.9±1.4, P<0.001); MHS-scores (10.7±1.7, P<0.001) and efavirenz-treatment; PHS-scores (9±1.1, P<0.001); MHS-scores (6.7, P<0.001) groups. Changes were not significantly different (PHS: P=0.106, MHS: P=0.087) between treatment-group comparison. Dolutegravir-treated women presented significantly higher improvements in physical function scores (8.18±3.2, P=0.012) than efavirenz treatment-group. Treatment-effects were not significant on PHS-scores (F(1,178)=0.00, P=0.967) and MHS-scores (F(1,177)=0.60, P=0.441) adjusting for viral-loads and CD4-count. After 48weeks postpartum, increase in PHS-scores and MHS-scores remained significant in both treatment-groups but were not significantly different between-groups (PHS: 1.1±1.0, P=0.269, MHS: -0.8±1.6, P=0.606). Dolutegravir-treated women presented higher scores in 8/11 MOS-HIV subscales relative to efavirenz group. Treatment effects remained insignificant on PHS-scores F(1,193)=1.32, P=0.252 and MHS-scores F(1,191)=0.04, P=0.841 adjusting for viral-loads and CD4-count.

CONCLUSIONS: Increases in HRQoL-scores were generally higher in dolutegravir-treated women at 24weeks and 48weeks postpartum but not significantly different from those in efavirenz. Relationship between viral-load, CD4-count with PHS-scores and MHS-scores were similar in both treatments-groups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PIN90

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×