Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tirbanibulin for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis from a Scottish NHS Perspective

Author(s)

Lopez Pont MA1, Dymond A2, Green W2, Edwards M3, Gupta G4
1Almirall SA, Barcelona, Spain, 2York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK, 3York Health Economics Consortium, York, YOR, UK, 4Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK

OBJECTIVES: Actinic keratosis is a chronic skin condition that may cause pain, itch and bleeding. It may also develop into squamous cell carcinoma if left untreated. Many of the active topical interventions are associated with substantial adverse event rates and/or require relatively long treatment courses. Tirbanibulin 1% is a recently launched 5-day course topical treatment for the face and scalp. Results of two phase III clinical trials indicate that tirbanibulin leads to significant improvements in the complete clearance of actinic keratosis lesions at 57 days (vs placebo). The aim was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of tirbanibulin, compared to the three most common topical therapies, from a Scottish perspective.

METHODS: A one-year decision tree model was developed to compare tirbanibulin with diclofenac sodium gel 3%, imiquimod cream 5%, and fluorouracil cream 5%. Patients were separated into two categories: successful and unsuccessful. Treatment was ‘successful’ if no clinically visible lesions remained at the end of the treatment period. The probability of complete clearance associated with each treatment was informed from a network meta-analysis. The probability of treatment-related adverse events (in the form of severe local skin reactions) were informed from a targeted literature search. The model captured direct medical costs associated with treatment acquisition, treatment-related adverse events and healthcare professional visits. Disutilities associated with actinic keratosis and local skin reactions were also captured.

RESULTS: Over a one-year time horizon tirbanibulin led to cost savings of £31.35, £76,16 and £92.84 versus diclofenac, imiquimod, and fluorouracil respectively. Additionally, tirbanibulin was dominant, as it was associated with negligibly higher quality-adjusted life years of approximately 0.005. Tirbanibulin also remained cost saving when model inputs were varied in sensitivity and scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Tirbanibulin is cost-saving and cost-effective for the treatment of actinic keratosis in Scotland when compared with the most commonly used topical therapies.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

HTA186

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×