Budget Cap With Pay Back As Managed Entry Agreement Policy: Bulgarian Example for Rheumatology Medicines

Author(s)

Mitkova Z1, Tachkov K2, Boyadzhieva V3, Manev I2, Stoilov N3, Petrova G4
1Medical University-Sofia, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sofia, 22, Bulgaria, 2Medical University-Sofia, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sofia, Bulgaria, 3Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria, 4Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the influence of budget cap with pay back managed entry agreement (MEA) as cost-containment measure in Bulgaria on public spending for rheumatology medicines.

METHODS: Retrospective, observational, macroeconomic analysis of National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) spending for reimbursed rheumatology products during 2019 – 2021 after the introduction of budget cap with pay back MEA. On total 17 medicines (INNs) are selected from the official registers of NHIF. Their reimbursed spending were calculated as per three main groups of MEAs (group A, B, C) and the differences were statistically tested. Costs are presented in national currency BGN (ex-change rate 1BGN=0.95Euro).

RESULTS: The total reimbursed budget for rheumatology products increased from 100.5 to 102 million of BGN during 2019–2021 (p>0.05). Group A (prescribed after a consultation with committee from 3 specialists) includes 13 biological and 1 JAK inhibitor and their budget share is more than 99%. Only upadacitinib decreased its reimbursed budget in 2021.We also noted an increase in utilization and reimbursed amount of new biosimilar products. Group B (all other medicines out of group A) include methotrexate and NSADs with budget of 25 thousand BGN. Group C (oncology and life-saving medicines) include only dexamethasone with budget of 105 thousand of BGN. Reimbursed budget for group B and C declined<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The result of introduced budget cap with pay back MEA as cost-containment measures is not visible yet three years after its introduction. Only the budget for NSADs and non-biological products decreased. On opposite budget for biologicals increased but their prescribing increased which shows that most patients can benefit.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

HPR132

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Reimbursement & Access Policy, Risk-sharing Approaches

Disease

SDC: Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×