The Disparity in the Utilization of Drugs for Multiple Myeloma Using Real-World Data in the US
Author(s)
Verma V1, Mishra N2, Gaur A2, Gupta A2, Kukreja I3, Pandey S2, Nayyar A2, Daral S2, Chopra A2, Roy A2, Dawar V2
1Optum, Gurgaon, HR, India, 2Optum, Gurugram, HR, India, 3Optum, New Delhi, DL, India
OBJECTIVES: To explore the disparity in utilization of recommended first-line regimen of Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide in the new multiple myeloma patients
METHODS: This study included patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma between 1st Jan 2017 to 31st Dec 2019 with ICD-9 and ICD-10-CM diagnosis recorded in the Optum® de-identified Market Clarity Dataset, which links medical and pharmacy claims with EHR data from providers across the continuum of care. Patients with continuous eligibility/healthcare activity of pre- and post-index 12 months were included in the study and who didn’t have multiple myeloma diagnosis in pre-index time. We have looked utilization of a doublet regimen of Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide in the post-index period of 12 months and results were descriptively analyzed by race/ethnicity, insurance type, and region to find any disparity. We have only considered when this doublet regimen is used as a first-line treatment.
RESULTS: Among 3,898 new multiple myeloma patients 476 (12%) patients utilized Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide regimen (Rd regimen) as their first-line treatment. 13.5% (19 patients) of Hispanics, 12.8% (352 patients) of Whites, 11.4% (74 patients) of Blacks, and 3.4% (2 patients) of Asians had Rd regimen as first-line therapy. Further statistical test will be applied to analyze the level of significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Blacks and Asians had lower access to Rd first-line regimen in comparison to Whites.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
RWD96
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health, Real World Data & Information Systems
Topic Subcategory
Health & Insurance Records Systems, Public Health
Disease
SDC: Oncology