Reduced Health Care Resource Utilisation and Costs Following a Switch From Multiple-Inhaler to Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in COPD Patients in a Real-World Primary Care Setting in England

Author(s)

Rothnie KJ1, Wood RP2, Czira A1, Banks VL2, Camidge LJ2, Massey OK2, Seif M2, Compton C1, Sharma R1, Ismaila A3
1Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK, 2Real-world Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK, 3Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate all-cause and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related health care resource utilisation (HCRU) and direct medical costs in patients with COPD before and after switching from multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) to once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI).

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of linked English primary and secondary care data. Patients aged ≥35 years, with a COPD diagnosis, linkage to secondary care data and GP registration for 12 months pre- (baseline) and 6 months post-index (follow-up), were indexed on initiation of FF/UMEC/VI immediately following MITT. Rate of HCRU and mean total medical costs were compared between baseline and follow-up for all patients and those with recent exacerbation.

RESULTS:

2675 patients were included (mean age 71.1 [SD 9.8] years, 52.2% male).

Post-switch, patients had significantly fewer COPD-related primary care attendances (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.70), inpatient stays (RR 0.82, 0.73–0.92) and emergency department (ED) attendances (RR 0.71, 0.62–0.82) and lower total costs (£961 pre-switch vs £729 post-switch, p<0.0001). All-cause primary care attendances were significantly lower (RR 0.96, 0.94–0.97) post-switch. All-cause inpatient stays, ED attendances and total costs were not significantly different. Among patients with ≥1 exacerbation during baseline, COPD-related primary care attendances (RR 0.67, 0.64–0.70), inpatient stays (RR 0.65, 0.57–0.74), ED attendances (RR 0.60, 0.52–0.70) and total costs (£1609 pre-switch vs £1104 post-switch, p<0.0001) were significantly lower post-switch. All-cause primary care attendances (RR 0.93, 0.91–0.96), inpatient stays (RR 0.88, 0.81–0.96) and ED attendances (RR 0.82, 0.75–0.90) were also significantly lower. All-cause total costs were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS:

COPD patients who switched from MITT to once-daily SITT FF/UMEC/VI had lower COPD-related HCRU and costs 6-months following the switch compared with 6-months pre-switch. The long-term benefits of switching from MITT to SITT requires further investigation.

Funding: GSK 218242

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

SA7

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

STA: Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×