SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Workshops are designed to share novel and innovative experiences in either the conduct of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research studies or the interpretation and use of pharmacoeconomics outcomes information in health care policy development.

  • An ISPOR workshop is similar to a one-hour short course with an audience participation element.
  • Standard and advanced methods topics workshop submissions follow the same review process.
  • All session submissions and presentations must be in English.
  • All session submissions and presentations must not promote any product or service.
  • Please do not submit duplicate submissions.
  • Submitted speakers must present in-person.
  • Registration is required for all presenters. Expenses associated with submissions and presentations are the responsibility of the presenter.
  • Submitters must agree to disclose AI-Assisted Content in the submission form. Failure to disclose submissions and/or accepted materials may result in its withdrawal from ISPOR. View ISPOR's AI policy.
  • Length of session descriptions: 300 words (or 2050 characters).
  • Example of a breakout session proposal submission is available here (downloadable PDF).

ISPOR Diversity Policy

ISPOR is strongly committed to diversity. The Society’s Strategic Plan and core values embrace excellence through encouragement and acceptance of diverse ideas, cultures, and disciplines. Workshop submissions are encouraged from all stakeholders and are evaluated based on merit. ISPOR also aims to reflect the diversity of its membership in all endeavors and encourages consideration of diversity in abstract submissions. Diversity dimensions include (but not limited to) gender, career stage, ethnicity, race, education, sexual orientation, region/geographic location, disabilities, and religion. Additional information can be found at the Society’s  Diversity Policy.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Below are instructions to assist with your Workshop proposal. To access the submission portal, you will need to login using your ISPOR web credentials. If you do not have an ISPOR web profile, follow the "Create an Account" link on the ISPOR login page.

 If you have any questions concerning the submission process, please contact conferences@ispor.org or ispor@support.ctimeetingtech.com.

 

STEP 1: SESSION INFORMATION

  • Session Title: You must enter a session title to save your session in our system. Titles are 225 characters max (including spaces). ISPOR reserves the right to modify abstract submissions based on ISPOR style guidelines. Examples:
    • Multi-Indication Pricing: Do We Want It? Can We Operationalize It?
    • Designing a Patient-Centered Value Framework to Guide Shared Decision-Making Oncology: Why, What, and How?
    • Are Existing Health Technology Assessment Requirements Inadequate for Establishing Value for Potentially Transformative Gene Therapies?
  • Acknowledgements: Submitting authors/submitters must agree to ISPOR being an in-person only event, and ISPOR’s AI-Assisted Content Disclosure.
  • Related ISPOR Track: Select the track that best fits your abstract submission from the drop-down menu.
  • Patient Engagement: Review the ISPOR definition of patient engagement and determine if your session meets the criteria by choosing yes or no from the drop-down menu.
  • Level of Difficulty: Indicate if this session is Introductory, Intermediate, or Advanced in nature.
  • Fast Facts: Are you interested in having your session converted into a 30-minute Fast Facts session? Select yes or no from the drop-down menu.

STEP 2: TAXONOMIES, TOPICS, AND LOCATION

  • Main Taxonomy/Topic: Select ONE of the taxonomy/topics that best describes your session (see next section below).
  • Additional Taxonomy/Topic: Select up to TWO additional taxonomy/topic areas that are applicable to your session (see next section below).
    •  These should be different than your primary taxonomy/topic area selected above. If you do not have an additional taxonomy/topic area, please select “Not Applicable.”
  • Location: What geographical region is this content about? Select all that apply.

Clinical Outcomes

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Clinician Reported Outcomes

Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes

Performance-based Outcomes

Clinician Outcomes Assessment

Economic Evaluation

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Budget Impact Analysis

Trial-based economic evaluation

Value of Information

Cost-comparison/effectiveness/utility/benefit Analysis

Thresholds & Opportunity Cost

Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Novel & Social Elements of Value

Epidemiology & Public Health

Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Prevalence, Incidence, & Disease Risk Factors

Public Health

Disease Classification & Coding

Health Policy & Regulatory

Approval & Labeling

Reimbursement & Access Policy

Public Spending & National Health Expenditures

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways

Health Disparities & Equity

Pricing Policy & Schemes

Insurance Systems & National Health Care

Procurement Systems

Risk-sharing Approaches

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Hospital and Clinical Practices

Pharmacist Interventions and Practices

Telemedicine

Disease Management (including optimization studies)

Prescribing Behavior

Formulary Development

Quality of Care Measurement

Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Health Technology Assessment

Systems & Structure

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Value Frameworks & Dossier Format

Medical Technologies

Devices

Digital Health

Diagnostics

Other

Methodological & Statistical Research

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics

Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference

PRO & Related Methods

Survey Methods

Missing Data

Modeling, Simulation, Optimization

Preference Methods

Organizational Practices

Academic & Educational

Ethical

Geographic & Regional (not for epidemiology or treatment evaluation studies of population subgroups)

Industry

Best Research Practices

Patient-Centered Research

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance

Health State Utilities

Patient Behavior and Incentives

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Patient Engagement

Real World Data & Information Systems

Data Protection, Integrity, & Quality Assurance

Distributed Data & Research Networks

Health & Insurance Records Systems

Reproducibility & Replicability

Study Approaches

Clinical Trials (Traditional)

Prospective Observational Studies (including chart reviews and time and motion studies)

Surveys & Expert Panels

Literature Review & Synthesis

Meta-analysis & Indirect Comparisons

Pragmatic Trials & Large Simple Trials

Registries

Decision Modeling & Simulation

Retrospective Databases (EM&HR, Administrative Claims)

 

STEP 3: SESSION DESCRIPTION

  • Audience Interactive Element: Provide all interactive elements you plan to utilize in your session.
  • Workshop Description: Purpose/Description: There is a 302-word limit (2050 character limit. You will need to insert the headers “Purpose” and “Description” into the textbox.
    • Purpose: Provide a clear definition of the workshop’s objective. (Ensure that the purpose(s) is achievable in 60 minutes.)
    • Description: Provide a clear description of the topic including background information & audience participation.
      • The audience interactive element is an important criterion to fulfill. Here are examples:
        • Example 1: Each speaker will present a schematic of how patient preference data are included in their respective regulatory processes. The audience will participate in the evaluation exercise drawing on the pros versus cons of each arrangement to develop an ‘ideal’ process for using this data in healthcare decision making.
        • Example 2: The workshop will use real-time polling to work through the examples and conclude with an audience discussion about the opportunities and challenges of using these different methods for portfolio selection.
        • Example 3: The discussion leaders will conduct a real-time test of the validity of audience members’ preferences and help the audience evaluate the implications of such validity failures for regulatory decision-making.

STEP 4: SPEAKER(S)

A workshop is comprised of a minimum of 2 and maximum of 3 speakers. If accepted, speaker information will be published in conference materials as submitted and can only be modified by ISPOR staff.

  • Amongst the moderator and speakers, a diversity of stakeholders, work environments and/or geographic locations is strongly encouraged to provide different perspectives on the topic.
    • Only 2 speakers per organization is permitted.
  • Confirm or provide the names, degrees, institutions, city, state, country, email address, and work environment for your speakers.

Follow the steps in cOASIS to search/add your speakers. Each speaker will need an ISPOR profile in order to be added to your abstract. If you cannot find your author using the search fields, please use the create a new ISPOR profile link in the submission form. The ISPOR profile form will open in a new window/tab. Complete the information and close the window/tab to return to your submission and search again.

STEP 5: MODERATOR

A workshop is comprised of 1 moderator. Moderators maintain communication with presenters and ISPOR staff regarding the development and delivery of the session. Follow the steps in cOASIS to search/add your moderator. 

STEP 6: SUBMITTER

ISPOR collects information on the submission of each session, regardless if they are a speaker/moderator. Follow the steps in cOASIS to search/add your information. 

STEP 7: SUMMARY & FINALIZATION

Review your submission carefully and fix any incomplete items. If your submission is complete, click the “Finalize” button. You must complete this final step, otherwise your submission will be considered incomplete and not submitted for review. Please note: Once the submission is finalized it will be locked and no further editing is possible.

When you return to your ISPOR 2025 Submission Portal, your submission will be labeled "Complete" (green), "Locked" (green), or "Incomplete" (yellow). Submitters can revise "Complete" and "Incomplete" submissions at any time before the submission deadline. If you need to revise a "Locked" submission, contact ispor@support.ctimeetingtech.com or conferences@ispor.org before the submission deadline.

 


    CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF WORKSHOPS:

    Overall, workshop acceptance is based on the quality of the proposal and the topic’s importance for inclusion and discussion in this conference’s scientific program. Standard and advanced methods topics workshop submissions follow the same review process.

    Please consider the updated submission criteria when submitting your proposal:

    Quality of content

    • Educational value of the session
    • Timeliness of the topic
    • Applicability of content to HEOR practice or principles
    • Effectiveness of incorporated active learning strategies
    • The information/issue presented are novel or innovative
    • Workshop proposals includes examples drawn from multiple sources
    • Unbiased content that does not promote a product, service, or organization; abstracts deemed to be promotional will be excluded from consideration

    Quality of proposal

    • Plans for interactivity between the speakers and audience
    • Proposal purpose/issue is clearly defined
    • Issue panel proposals have more than one perspective identified
    • The background information (included in the overview) is clear and concise

    Quality of Speakers

    • Expertise/experience of proposed speakers
    • Proposed speakers represent diverse backgrounds (gender, geographic, institutional - refer to ISPOR Diversity policy) and perspectives (multiple organizations are represented)
    Your browser is out-of-date

    ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

    ×