Cost-Utility Analysis of Eptinezumab Versus Erenumab for Episodic Migraine Headaches Patients in the United States

Author(s)

Dong W(, Bounthavong M
University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of eptinezumab as a preventive treatment of migraine in patients with episodic migraine (EM).

METHODS: A hybrid decision-Markov model was constructed to access the cost-effectiveness of eptinezumab as a preventive treatment for migraines compared to erenumab among EM patients from the United States (US) healthcare payer’s perspective. A decision tree model was constructed to simulate the probability of patients experiencing more than 50% reduction in monthly migraine days for six months after therapy initiation. The Markov model was conducted over a 10-year horizon and consisted of three states: “Off Preventive Treatment”, “Preventive Treatment”, and death. Subjects entered the Markov model in either the “Preventive Treatment” or “Off Preventive Treatment” state. Eptinezumab and erenumab costs were based on the US Veteran Affairs Federal Supply Schedule prices. Probabilities and utility scores were based on published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated, and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve was created to evaluate the probability of each strategy’s cost-effectiveness across a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold between $0 and $100,000 per QALY gained.

RESULTS: In the base-case results, the total costs for eptinezumab and erenumab were $3459 and $1491. Total QALYs for eptinezumab and erenumab were 5.93 and 5.83. Base-case ICER was $19,126 per QALY gained. In the PSA, total costs for eptinezumab and erenumab were $3481 (95% CrI: 1755, 6094) and $1414 (95% CrI: 540, 2903). Total QALYs for eptinezumab and erenumab were 5.93 (95% CrI: 4.12, 7.29) and 5.82 (95% CrI: 4.36, 7.31). ICER was $19,753 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS: Eptinezumab was cost-effective at a WTP threshold that was greater than $19,753 per additional QALY gained; however, the probability of cost-effectiveness was slightly higher than the indifference level of 50%.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

EE302

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Biologics & Biosimilars, Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×