Cost per Responder for FcRn Inhibitors for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Author(s)

Betts A1, Ting A2, Montilva J3
1UCB Pharma Ltd, Slough, UK, 2UCB Pharma, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 3UCB Pharma, London, UK

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost per responder of recently approved FcRn inhibitors for the treatment of generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG), with responder defined as those who achieved at least a 3-point reduction in their baseline MG-ADL score.

METHODS: A systematic literature review identified relevant randomised controlled studies in gMG which allowed for a network meta-analysis (NMA) to be performed for rozanolixizumab 7mg/kg, rozanolixizumab 10mg/kg, and efgartigimod 10mg/kg. Assumptions for weight distribution and mean number of infusions (21.6 for rozanolixizumab, 20.6 for efgartigimod) were from a recent physician survey of gMG patients in the United States and clinical trial data, respectively. Cost per responder was estimated by dividing the drug wholesale acquisition price for the first year of treatment in the US per patient by the probability of MG-ADL response. Current evidence from the long-term extension studies for each drug suggests a similar responder rate across multiple cycles up to 52 weeks; thus the responder rate was assumed constant across cycles in the first year of treatment.

RESULTS: Two phase 3 studies were identified through the SLR, MycarinG and ADAPT comparing rozanolixizumab 7mg/kg and 10mg/kg to placebo and efgartigimod 10mg/kg to placebo respectively. While there were numerical differences between rozanolixizumab 10mg/kg, 7mg/kg and efgartigimod (0.77, 0.74 and 0.72 respectively), there were no statistically significant differences, thus an average responder rate of 0.74 was used. The cost per responder for the first year of treatment, was $365,827.82 for rozanolixizumab and $403,874.26 for efgartigimod.

CONCLUSIONS: While the FcRn inhibitor class were shown to have similar responder rates, rozanolixizumab showed lower cost per responder based on gMG patients’ weight distribution and clinical trial infusion data. Using products with lower cost per responder may result in cost savings for the healthcare system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

EE219

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Neurological Disorders, Rare & Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×