Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fixed-Dose Triple Combination Therapy (LINAGLIPTIN/METFORMIN/EMPAGLIFOZIN) Vs. Its Fixed-Dose Double Combination and Individual Components

Author(s)

Winberg D1, Shi L2
1Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of once-daily 25 mg Empagliflozin, 5 mg Linagliptin, and 1000 mg Metformin XR triple-fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus its dual FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin plus Metformin and its individual components.

METHODS:

The Building, Relating, Assessing, and Validating Outcomes (BRAVO) diabetes model was used to assess costs and outcomes with an antidiabetic FDC vs. its equivalent formulations from a US national health payer perspective. Patients were assumed to receive either the triple FDC, double FDC or the three individual components for the 40-year time horizon with 3% annual discounting. Baseline characteristics, changes in clinical parameters, and rates of adverse events were derived from the 24-week results of trial NCT01422876, the ACCORD trial, and data from Boehringer Ingelheim. Medication costs were taken from Good RX. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), direct medical costs per person, and the incidence of diabetes complications. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed with WTP threshold of $50000/QALY.

RESULTS:

Treatment with triple FDC was associated with a decrease of 0.01 life-years (LY) and an increase of 0.002 QALYs and a cost-savings of $8,596 compared with double FDC. Compared with Linagliptin, FDC led to an increase of 0.38 LY and 0.25 QALYs, and increased costs by $3,472 Compared with Empaglifozin, the triple FDC led to an increase of 0.1 LY, 0.08 QALYs, and saved $42758. The ICER compared to the double, Linglipatin, and Empaglifozin was -4306250, 13803, and -552498 respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 50,000, the triple FDC was cost-effective compared to all three alternatives. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that results were cost-effective 100% of the time at the $50,000/QALY threshold.

CONCLUSIONS:

The triple FDC treatment demonstrated to be a dominant alternative to double FDC + Metformin and Empagliflozin + Metformin and cost-effective compared to Linagliptin + Metformin.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EE226

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×