Impact of Updated Mortality Estimates on the Cost-Effectiveness of Rifaximin for the Treatment of Patients with Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy

Author(s)

Bhattacharyya S1, John D1, Thomas A2, Soni P1, Jesudian AB3, Dashputre AA4, Joseph G4
1PharmaQuant, Kolkata, WB, India, 2PharmaQuant Insights Pvt Ltd, Kolkata, India, 3Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA, 4Bausch Health US, LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Rifaximin is the only United States (US) Food and Drug Administration approved therapy for reducing the risk of recurrent overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in adults. A study by Jesudian AB et al. (2020) showed that rifaximin ± lactulose (vs. lactulose monotherapy) is cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] of $29,161/quality adjusted life years [QALY] gained). The authors used mortality estimates from a single-arm, open-label study. The objectives of the current study were to: 1) identify updated rifaximin-associated OHE mortality estimates for US patients and; 2) conduct scenario analyses to assess the robustness of the original model by measuring the impact of assuming no/updated mortality estimates on the ICER of rifaximin for OHE.

METHODS: A targeted literature review (TLR; as of August 2022) was conducted using PubMed and Ovid (MEDLINE and EMBASE) databases to identify studies reporting the US mortality rates for OHE patients treated with rifaximin or lactulose. In the scenario analyses, the impact of assuming (rifaximin-associated): a) no mortality benefits and b) updated mortality estimates on the ICER (2018 dollars) of rifaximin treatment for OHE was assessed.

RESULTS: The TLR yielded a total of 19 relevant studies out of the 7,500 studies identified during the initial search. Of the 19 studies, only 2 US studies (Bajaj et al. 2019; Landaverde et al. 2020) were published after the Jesudian AB study was conducted. In the scenario analysis, assuming no rifaximin-associated mortality benefits yielded an ICER of $29,163-$29,914/QALY gained. Further, using the mortality data from Bajaj et al. and Landaverde et al. yielded an ICER of $29,244 and $29,155, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Assuming no rifaximin-associated mortality and using mortality estimates from more recent US studies demonstrates that mortality was not a key model parameter and does not significantly impact the ICER for rifaximin for OHE. This finding corroborates the robustness of the original model’s ICER estimate.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EE232

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×