Application of Bayesian Multi-Parameter Evidence Synthesis to Achieve Clinical Plausibility of Lifetime Survival Extrapolations in First-Line Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC)
Author(s)
Sharpe D1, Yates G1, García-Fernández L2, Yuan Y3, Lee A4, Chaudhary MA5
1Parexel, London, LON, UK, 2Parexel, Madrid, CA, Spain, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA, 4Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, LON, UK, 5Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
Lifetime overall survival (OS) extrapolations are required to estimate important differences in costs and benefits between comparators in health economic models. Bayesian multi-parameter evidence synthesis (B-MPES) models for aNSCLC patients receiving second-line nivolumab have previously demonstrated clinically reasonable and stable estimates for long-term OS. Here, we investigate the plausibility of B-MPES predictions for OS in the CheckMate 227 Part 1 trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) in aNSCLC patients in the first-line setting and compare with uninformed standard parametric models (SPMs).METHODS:
The B-MPES approach yields a smooth parametric model that integrates relevant registry data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to inform one-year conditional survival beyond the trial follow-up period. At longer times (>20 years), trial-matched general population mortality data is similarly incorporated to capture an age-related mortality effect. We implemented B-MPES models and SPMs fitted to the NIVO+IPI arm for the 2- and 5-year database locks (DBLs) of CheckMate 227, irrespective of PD-L1.RESULTS:
The B-MPES model fitted to the 2-year DBL accurately anticipates the observed NIVO+IPI survival in the extended follow-up of the 5-year DBL (5-year OS: 22.4% [95% CrI (credible interval): 19.6-25.5%] vs 22.5% [95% CI (confidence interval): 19.2-26.2%] Kaplan-Meier). The best-fitting 2-year SPM similarly yields agreement with subsequently observed 5-year OS (21.0% [95% CI: 17.8-24.2%]). B-MPES estimates for 20-year OS are conservative and consistent across DBLs, whereas SPM estimates are implausibly optimistic when compared to background mortality data (2-year DBL: B-MPES 1.4% [95% CrI: 1.1-1.7%] vs SPM 5.5% [95% CI: 4.1-7.2%]; 5-year DBL: B-MPES 1.4% [95% CrI: 1.1-1.6%] vs SPM 4.7% [95% CI: 3.6-6.0%]).CONCLUSIONS:
B-MPES models generate robust estimates of long-term OS for aNSCLC patients receiving NIVO+IPI, even with limited follow-up. SPMs perform reasonably well in anticipating OS observed with extended follow-up but generate unreliable estimates for long-term OS without post hoc adjustment.Conference/Value in Health Info
2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
MSR29
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology