Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib (PEM+AXI) for the First-Line Treatment of Intermediate- and Poor (I/P)-Risk Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients in Colombia

Author(s)

Dhanji N1, Van De Wetering G2, Guiot V3, Barco V4, Mejia A5, May JR6, Garcia J7, Dyer M6
1OPEN Health, Oxford, UK, 2OPEN Health, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Bogota, CUN, Colombia, 4Bristol Myers Squibb, Cali-Valle, Colombia, 5Bristol Myers Squibb, Bogota, Colombia, 6Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK, 7Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Immuno-oncology (IO) combination NIVO+IPI and IO+tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination (PEM+AXI) therapies have demonstrated significant clinical benefits over sunitinib in the first-line (1L) treatment of I/P-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We examined the cost-effectiveness of NIVO+IPI versus PEM+AXI for this from a Colombian payer perspective, utilizing a novel approach to estimate comparative efficacy between the treatments.

METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model (progression-free, progressed, and death) was developed to estimate costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) over a 40-year time horizon. Due to the lack of head-to-head clinical evidence between NIVO+IPI and PEM+AXI, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison that accounted for any imbalance in observed treatment effect modifiers was performed. To extrapolate outcomes over a lifetime horizon, a range of parametric survival curves were fitted to the adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival data, which accounted for non-proportional hazards over time. The model used baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, background mortality) from Colombian literature. In the absence of Colombian EQ-5D-3L tariffs, utilities (EQ-5D-3L) were taken from CheckMate 214 and calculated using the Argentinian value set. All costs (2022 COL$) were Colombian-specific where available. Costs and health outcomes were both discounted by 5% annually in line with IETS guidelines. Robustness of the results was evaluated through extensive sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses.

RESULTS: NIVO+IPI was associated with cost savings (COL$ 294,303,933), higher LYs (4.70 vs 4.25) and QALYs (4.08 vs 3.54) versus PEM+AXI, resulting in NIVO+IPI dominating PEM+AXI. Key model drivers were the treatment duration for PEM, NIVO and AXI. NIVO+IPI remained dominant in all scenario analyses, which indicated that model results were robust to alternative modelling inputs or assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that NIVO+IPI is estimated to be a life-extending and potentially cost-saving 1L treatment option when compared with PEM+AXI for I/P risk aRCC patients in Colombia.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EE81

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×