Using Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs) in Your Research Study Does Not Necessarily Make It Patient-Centric
Author(s)
Moderator: Hoda Fotovvat, PhD, Evidera, Bethesda , MD, USA
Speakers: Eleanor M Perfetto, PhD, RPh, MS, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, VENICE, FL, USA; Katja Rudell, PhD, MSc, Parexel International, LONDON, LON, UK; Kathleen Wyrwich, PhD, Bristol Myers Squibb, St. Louis, MO, USA
Presentation Documents
In this session, we will define patient-centricity, highlight reasons for using COA methodology in research studies, and describe how this can improve the relevance of new health technologies to patients. Members of the ISPOR community work on new health technologies at various stages of the lifecycle to meet different evidence requirements, and a common theme should be patient centeredness.
The speakers will outline different methodologies and associated regulatory guidance that pertains to COA and drive towards being patient focused to meet their needs. We will discuss how best to use qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods for appropriately capturing the patient voice, ensuring measured outcomes are patient centered throughout the technology development journey. Case studies will be presented on how patient insights can inform COAs development. Panel members and attendees will discuss and derive a framework for understanding how COA methods can be optimized for authentic patient-centered research in the development of health technologies.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Code
216
Topic
Clinical Outcomes