BIOLOGIC THERAPIES FOR MODERATE-TO-SEVERE PSORIASIS: COST PER RESPONDER ANALYSIS CONSIDERING PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Carvalho A1, Vieira Duarte G2, Ianhez M3, Silva BL4, Biella C5, dos Santos R5
1Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Salvador, Brazil, 3Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil, 4AbbVie Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil, 5AbbVie Brazil, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-per-responder of biologic therapies available in Brazil to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) using as outcomes a reduction of 75%, 90%, and 100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75/90/100).

METHODS: Comparative cost-effectiveness of risankizumab, adalimumab, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab was evaluated for the Brazilian private healthcare system using a cost-per-responder analysis based on PASI score reduction. Efficacy data was extracted from a previously published network meta-analysis (NMA). Cost-per-responder included cost of drug acquisition (ex-factory price) in 3 time horizons (primary response period [12-16 weeks], 1-year and 2-years) multiplied by the number needed to treat (NNT) for each PASI endpoint.

RESULTS: Considering NMA base case, the lowest cost-per-responder considering primary response period was observed for risankizumab for PASI 75, 90, and 100 (BRL40,106; 47,729; 83,496, respectively), followed by guselkumab (BRL41,338, 50,906; 94,520, respectively). Overall, the differences in the mean cost-per-responder between risankizumab and other biologic drugs increased with higher PASI reduction. Highest cost-per-responder was observed for infliximab for PASI 75 (BRL64,096) and etanercept for PASI 90 and PASI 100 (BRL131,674; 539,540, respectively). In 1-year, cost-per-responder using PASI 75, 90 and 100 was lowest for risankizumab (BRL92,341; 103,472; 140,909, respectively), followed by ixekizumab (BRL107,329; 128,395; 199,155, respectively). In 2-years time horizon, cost-per-responder using PASI 75, 90 and 100 was lowest for risankizumab (BRL166,214; 186,250; 253,636, respectively), followed by ixekizumab (BRL189,404; 226,579; 351,449, respectively). Using data from NMA sensitivity analysis, risankizumab presented the lowest cost-per-responder for PASI 100 (BRL269,432) whereas guselkumab and risankizumab presented the lowest cost-per-responder for PASI 75 (BRL165,269; 168,059, respectively) and PASI 90 (BRL190,540; 190,706, respectively) in 2-years.

CONCLUSIONS: Among the evaluated biologic therapies, risankizumab was associated with lowest cost-per-responder in all analyzed PASI outcomes, with more pronounced difference in higher PASI responses, considering Brazilian private healthcare system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PBI18

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Distributed Data & Research Networks, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×