Cost-Effectiveness Model of Lebrikizumab Compared to Dupilumab in the Treatment of Austrian Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Author(s)
Schwarz B1, Sole-Feu L2, Akmaz B3
1Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Almirall SA, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 3Pricing and Medical Affairs Almirall S.A., Reinbek, SH, Germany
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The objective is to carry out an economic analysis comparing lebrikizumab vs. dupilumab in Austrian patients with moderate to severe Atopical Dermatitis (AD) from local SHI funds perspective.
METHODS: The Austrian model is based on the cost-effectiveness models in AD by NICE appraisal TA814. Lebrikizumab proved to be assessed in indirect clinical comparisons as similarly effective and safe to dupilumab (Standard of Care). In the base case, it is assumed that all patients are treated without corticosteroids ("monotherapy"). The model refers to patients from the age of 12 with a body weight of at least 40 kg, with moderate to severe forms of atopic dermatitis (AD), in whom systemic treatments were not sufficiently effective, were not tolerated or were contraindicated. For the first year of treatment, it contains a decision tree; from the second year, a Markov model. Austrian tariffs and prices from January 2024 are used.
RESULTS: The base case is a lifelong model, with 3% discounting and combination therapy with topical corticosteroids if needed and shows that lebrikizumab has a cost advantage of €2,409 compared to dupilumab.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary lebrikizumab proves to be economically recommendable compared to dupilumab in a cost advantage over dupilumab in lifelong observation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
EE705
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Drugs